ArticleBMC health services research2019
Increase of catastrophic health expenditure while it does not have socio-economic inequality anymore; findings from a district in Tehran after recent extensive health sector reform.
Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The socioeconomic and health system determinants of financial protection indicators: a global systematic review (2008-2023).BMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
- What influences the impact of health financing reforms? Using qualitative comparative analysis to identify patterns in health financing systems and their effects on financial protection.SSM - health systems · 2025Review
- Household Catastrophic Health Expenditures in Maternal Care: A Cross-Sectional Study From Semnan, Iran.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Financial toxicity and acute injury in the Kilimanjaro region: An application of the Three Delays Model.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Governmental support for achieving "VISION 2020: the Right to Sight" in Iran: the cataract surgical rates.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Iran health insurance system in transition: equity concerns and steps to achieve universal health coverage.International journal for equity in health · 2021Review
- Health Transformation Plan Achievements and Outcomes in Iran (2014-2020): A Scoping Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021Article
- Correction to: Increase of catastrophic health expenditure while it does not have socio-economic anymore; finding from a district on Tehran after recent extensive health sector reform.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Catastrophic Health Expenditure before and after of the Implementation of Health Sector Evolution Plan in Iran.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnsuring financial protection of the community against health care expenditures is one of the fundamental goals of the health system. Catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) occurs when out-of-pocket health expenditures due to health care expenses considerably affect family life. The main purpose of this study was to analyze CHE trend over time and to determine its determinants.
methodsThe last round of a three part study over time was conducted in June to September 2015 on 600 households in a non-affluent area of Tehran. The World Health Survey questionnaire was used to collect information. Health expenditure was considered to be catastrophic when OOP health expenditures exceed 40% of household's capacity to paysubsistence expenditures. After calculating the amount of households' exposure to CHE, determinants resulting in CHE using logistic regression and the amount of economic inequality in the exposure of households to CHE using the concentration index were calculated. Then, performing a decomposition analysis, the contribution of each of the studied variables to the observed economic inequality was determined. All the findings were compared with the results of studies carried out in the years 2003 and 2008.
resultsIn the year 2015, 29.9% of households incurred CHE. This amount was 12.6 and 11.8% in the 2003 and 2008 studies, respectively. The concentration index was - 0.017(confidence interval; - 0.086 to 0.051), which, unlike the CI calculated in the years 2003 and 2008, was not significant. The most important determinant affecting the exposure to CHE was inpatient service utilization (OR = 1.64).
conclusionComparing to the whole national wide findings in sum, in 2015, the amount of the exposure of the studied households to CHE was significant, and it in comparison with the results of the previous studies was increased. However, there was no significant economic inequality and the observed levels of inequalityin comparison with the results of the previous studies conducted in 2003 and 2008 were decreased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.