Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31412815›Full record

Observational studyBMC pediatrics2019

Physical activity and screen time in out of school hours care: an observational study.

Carol Maher, Rosa Virgara, Tony Okely, Rebecca Stanley, Millie Watson, Lucy Lewis

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Development and Testing of an Out-of-School Hours Care Professional Development Program: A Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Physical activity in out of school hours care: an observational study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Observational
  10. First Graders' Stationary Behavior in Norwegian After-School Programs: A Mixed Methods Investigation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carol MaherSchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. carol.maher@unisa.edu.au.
Rosa VirgaraSchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Tony OkelyFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Rebecca StanleyFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Millie WatsonSchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Lucy LewisCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to describe, and identify predictors of, physical activity and screen time in children attending out of school hours care (OSHC).

methodTwenty-three randomly selected OSHC centres (n = 1068 children) participated in this observational, cross-sectional study. Service directors completed interviews regarding policy, training, scheduling and equipment related to physical activity and screen time. Children's activity behaviours (moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), light physical activity, sedentary time and screen time) were measured using standardised direct observation.

resultsDirectors' interviews revealed a lack of formal policy guiding physical activity and screen time. Time spent in activity behaviours varied widely among OSHC services; for example, average time spent in MVPA ranged from 4 to 49% of the session, time spent sedentary ranged from 31 to 79%, and screen time accounted for 0 to 41%. MVPA was inversely associated with total sedentary time (p < 0.001). Higher screen time was associated with OSHC services being larger in size (p = 0.04), offering screen activities on a daily basis (as opposed to less than daily; p = 0.001), offering screen activities prior to 5 pm (as opposed to offering screen activity 5 pm or later; p = 0.02), and having a larger number of screen devices available (p = 0.08).

conclusionPhysical activity and screen time practices in OSHC services are currently ad hoc and variable. In future, development of guidelines, policy and intervention programs may help improve physical activity and screen time in the OSHC setting.

Indexed as

ExerciseScreen TimeChildChild CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSedentary BehaviorAfter school careChildChildcareChildrenExerciseSedentary behaviourTelevisionVideogames

Identifiers

PMID31412815
PMCPMC6693127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.