Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31412797›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2019

Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism.

Chiao-Hsuan Chien, Fu-Chieh Shih, Chin-Yu Chen, Chia-Hui Chen, Wan-Ling Wu, Chee-Wai Mak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Life-threatening pulmonary embolism seen as hyperdense clots on unenhanced CT.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chiao-Hsuan ChienDepartment of Radiology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, No.901, Zhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist, Tainan City, 710, Taiwan, Republic of China. kalanono@gmail.com.
Fu-Chieh ShihDepartment of Emergency, Chi-Mei Medical Center, No. 901, Zhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist, Tainan City, 710, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chin-Yu ChenDepartment of Radiology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, No.901, Zhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist, Tainan City, 710, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chia-Hui ChenDepartment of Radiology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, No.901, Zhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist, Tainan City, 710, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Wan-Ling WuDepartment of Radiology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, No.901, Zhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist, Tainan City, 710, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chee-Wai MakDepartment of Radiology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, No.901, Zhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist, Tainan City, 710, Taiwan, Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, contrast is contraindicated in some patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) for diagnosis of central PE using CTPA as the gold standard.

methodsThe records of patients with suspected PE seen between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were an acute, central PE confirmed by CTPA and non-enhanced MDCT before contrast injection. Patients with a PE ruled out by CTPA served as a control group. MDCT findings studied were high-attenuation emboli in pulmonary artery (PA), main PA dilatation > 33.2 mm, and peripheral wedge-shaped consolidation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MDCT to detect PE. Wells score of all patients were calculated using data extracted from medical records prior to imaging analysis.

resultsThirty-two patients with a PE confirmed by CTPA and 32 with a PE ruled out by CTPA were included. Among the three main MDCT findings, high-attenuation emboli in the PA showed best diagnostic performance (Sensitivity 72.9%; Specificity 100%), followed by main PA dilatation > 33.2 mm (sensitivity 46.9%; specificity 90.6%), and peripheral wedge-shaped consolidation (sensitivity 43.8%; specificity 78.1%). Given any one or more positive findings on unenhanced MDCT, the sensitivity was 96.9% and specificity was 71.9% for a diagnosis of PE in patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of a composite measure of unenhanced MDCT findings (0.909) was significantly higher than that of the Wells score (0.688), indicating unenhanced MDCT was reliable for detecting PE than Wells score.

conclusionsUnenhanced MDCT is an alternative for the diagnosis of acute central PE when CTPA is not available.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveComputed Tomography AngiographyContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyPulmonary ArteryPulmonary EmbolismRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaCTPAHigh attenuationPulmonary artery dilatationWedge-shaped consolidation

Identifiers

PMID31412797
PMCPMC6692926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.