ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2019
Joint Shock/Death Risk Prediction Model for Patients Considering Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00000609 (Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT)
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of death without prior appropriate therapy in ICD recipients: the comorbidities, frailty and functional status (COMFFORT study).Open heart · 2024Observational
- An augmented illness-death model for semi-competing risks with clinically immediate terminal events.Statistics in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- A novel approach to joint prediction of preeclampsia and delivery timing using semicompeting risks.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Article
- Machine Learning-Based Phenomapping in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Racial differences in setting of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement in older adults with heart failure and association with disparate post-implant outcomes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Toward Better Risk Stratification for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients: Implications of Explainable Machine Learning Models.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Article
- Article
- N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Risk Stratification of Heart Failure Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Arrhythmic and Mortality Outcomes Among Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients Receiving Primary ICD Therapy.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2022Article
- Cardiac magnetic resonance left atrial volumes and function to predict appropriate device therapy and death.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- Modalities for predicting events in patients with ICDs: Expanding the versatility of FDG PET.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Time to Shock the System: Moving Beyond the Current Paradigm for Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of death or appropriate therapy varies widely among recipients of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). The goals of this study were to develop a risk prediction tool that jointly considers future outcome probabilities of ICD shock and death. METHODS AND
resultsWe performed a secondary analysis of patients receiving ICDs as part of the SCD-HeFT trial (Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial). We applied an illness-death regression model to jointly model both ICD shocks and death under the semi-competing risks framework, which predicts for each patient their probability of having received ICD shocks, dying, or both at any given point in time. Among 803 ICD recipients (mean age, 60 years; 23% women) followed for a median of 41.1 months, 430 (53.5%) patients completed the study without dying or receiving an ICD shock, 206 (25.7%) received at least 1 shock but survived, 113 (14.1%) died before experiencing a shock, and 54 (6.7%) received at least 1 shock and subsequently died. Predicted outcome probabilities based on baseline demographic and clinical variables reveal substantial heterogeneity in joint shock and death risks, both between patients at each time point and for each single patient across time. Overall, predictive performance for ICD shock and death individually was adequate, based on area under the curve at 5 years of 0.65 for shocks and of 0.79 for death.
conclusionsOur analysis of outcomes after ICD implantation provides an alternative predictive model for individual risk of death or ICD shocks. If validated, this may provide a useful tool for individualized counseling regarding likely outcomes after device implantation, while also informing the design of further studies to focus the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy. CLINICAL
trial registrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000609.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.