Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31412635›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Association between Advanced Glycation End Products, Soluble RAGE Receptor, and Endothelium Dysfunction, Evaluated by Circulating Endothelial Cells and Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients with Mild and Resistant Hypertension.

Bogna Gryszczyńska, Magdalena Budzyń, Beata Begier-Krasińska, Angelika Osińska, Maciej Boruczkowski, Mariusz Kaczmarek, Alicja Bukowska, Maria Iskra, Magdalena Paulina Kasprzak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Intracranial Aneurysms Induced byFrontiers in neurology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bogna GryszczyńskaDepartment of General Chemistry, Chair of Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland. bognagry@ump.edu.pl.
Magdalena BudzyńDepartment of General Chemistry, Chair of Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.
Beata Begier-KrasińskaDepartment of Hypertension, Angiology, and Internal Disease, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-848 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3464-1645
Angelika OsińskaDepartment of Hypertension, Angiology, and Internal Disease, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-848 Poznan, Poland.
Maciej BoruczkowskiDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.
Mariusz KaczmarekDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6282-3251
Alicja BukowskaMedical Analysis Laboratory Regional Blood Centre, 60-354 Poznan, Poland.
Maria IskraDepartment of General Chemistry, Chair of Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.
Magdalena Paulina KasprzakDepartment of General Chemistry, Chair of Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and soluble form of receptor RAGE (sRAGE) concentrations as well as the AGEs/sRAGE ratio in mild (MH) and resistant (RH) hypertensive patients in comparison with normotensive individuals. We also evaluated the association between AGEs, sRAGE as well as AGEs/sRAGE ratio and circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and circulating endothelial progenitor cells (CEPCs). The MH group consisted of 30 patients, whereas 30 patients were classified for the RH group. The control group (C) included 25 normotensive volunteers. AGEs and sRAGE were measured using enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The multicolor flow cytometry was used for analysis of CECs and CEPCs. Significantly higher levels of AGEs in RH cohort were observed as compared to C cohort. Furthermore, significantly lower sRAGE levels as well as a higher AGEs/sRAGE ratio were observed between MH and RH cohorts. Significant correlations were found in the MH cohort for sRAGE and CECs, and CEPCs. The elevation of AGEs levels suggests that oxidative modification of proteins occurs in hypertension pathogenesis. The decrease in sRAGE levels and elevation of the AGEs/sRAGE ratio in MH and RH groups may suggest that hypertensive patients are less protected against the side effects of AGEs as a consequence of an insufficient competitive role of sRAGE against the AGEs-RAGE axis. Finally, it may be concluded that the level of AGEs may be an independent predictor of the condition and function of the endothelium. Furthermore, sRAGE may be classified as a potential biomarker of inflammation and endothelium dysfunction.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersEndothelial CellsEndothelial Progenitor CellsEndothelium, VascularFemaleGlycation End Products, AdvancedHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedOxidation-ReductionOxidative StressReceptor for Advanced Glycation End ProductsBiomarkersGlycation End Products, AdvancedReceptor for Advanced Glycation End Productsendothelium dysfunctionmild hypertensionoxidative modification of proteinsoxidative stressreceptor sRAGEresistant hypertension

Identifiers

PMID31412635
PMCPMC6720658
OpenAlexW2967784252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.