ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2020
Differential processing of high-molecular-weight kininogen during normal pregnancy.
Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleStudies identified kininogen as a potential biomarker of preeclampsia, a major cause of adverse maternal outcomes. High-molecular-weight kininogen (HK) and its activated form participate in numerous pathways associated with establishing and maintaining pregnancy. However, dynamic changes in HK and naturally occurring HK-derived peptides during the natural course of pregnancy are largely unknown.
methodsLongitudinal serum samples during the course of normal pregnancy (trimesters T1, T2, T3) from 60 pregnant women were analyzed by western blot with an anti-HK antibody. Circulating peptides in longitudinal serum specimens derived from 50 participants were enriched using nanoporous silica thin films. Peptides were identified by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) and database searching. Relative quantification was performed using MaxQuant and in-house scripts. Normality was evaluated by either ANOVA or Friedman tests with p < 0.05 for statistical significance.
resultsWestern blotting revealed that HK significantly decreased during normal pregnancy (T1 vs T2, p < 0.05; T1 vs T3, p < 0.0001). A 100 kDa intermediate increased during pregnancy (T1 vs T2, p < 0.005; T1 vs T3, p < 0.01). Moreover, the heavy chain (T1 vs T2, p < 0.0001; T1 vs T3, p < 0.0001; T2 vs T3, p < 0.01) and light chain (T1 vs T2, p < 0.0001; T1 vs T3, p < 0.0001; T2 vs T3, p < 0.05) significantly increased during pregnancy. LC/MS/MS analysis identified 180 kininogen-1 peptides, of which 167 mapped to domain 5 (D5). Seventy-three peptides with ten or more complete data sets were included for further analysis. Seventy peptides mapped to D5, and 3, 24, and 43 peptides showed significant decrease, no trend, and significant increase, respectively, during pregnancy.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates dynamic changes in HK and naturally occurring HK-derived peptides during pregnancy. Our study sheds light on the gestational changes of HK and its peptides for further validation of them as potential biomarkers for pregnancy-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.