Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31412127›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2019

Oral Fluoroquinolone or Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs. ß-lactams as Step-Down Therapy for Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Chitra Punjabi, Vivian Tien, Lina Meng, Stan Deresinski, Marisa Holubar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gut check: antimicrobial stewardship opportunities in intra-abdominal infections.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Gram-negative bloodstream infections: where can we do better? A retrospective cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Clinical Outcomes ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Common Bacterial Infections in Persons Who Inject Drugs.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  19. Oral switch antibiotic therapy in uncomplicatedJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chitra PunjabiDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Vivian TienDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lina MengDepartment of Pharmacy, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stan DeresinskiDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Marisa HolubarDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · USStanford Health Care · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing published data, we sought to compare outcomes in patients transitioned to either oral fluoroquinolones (FQ) or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) versus ß-lactams (BL's) after an initial intravenous (IV) course for gram-negative rod (GNR) bacteremia.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE and published IDWeek abstracts. We included studies that reported all-cause mortality and/or infection recurrence in patients transitioned to oral FQ/TMP-SMX and BL's.

resultsEight retrospective studies met inclusion criteria with data for 2,289 patients, of whom 65% were transitioned to oral FQ, 7.7% to TMP-SMX, and 27.2% to BL's. Follow up periods ranged from 21 to 90 days. All-cause mortality was not significantly different between patients transitioned to either FQ/TMP-SMX or BL's (OR 1.13; 95%CI, 0.69-1.87). Overall recurrence of infection, either bacteremia or the primary site, occurred more frequently in patients transitioned to oral BL's vs. FQ's (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.61). Analysis limited to recurrent bacteremia was similarly suggestive although limited by small numbers (OR 2.32, 95% CI 0.99 to 5.44). However, based on known pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, prescribed ß-lactam dosing regimens were frequently suboptimal.

conclusionsIn the step-down IV to oral treatment of GNR bacteremia, we found insufficient data regarding outcomes after oral TMP-SMX; however, selection of a FQ over commonly utilized ß-lactam regimens may reduce chances of infection recurrence. While this may be a class effect, it may simply be the result of inadequate dosing of ß-lactams. Additional investigations are warranted to determine outcomes with TMP-SMX and optimized oral ß-lactam dosing regimens.

Identifiers

PMID31412127
PMCPMC6785705
OpenAlexW2968800494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.