Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31412062›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Ventricle stress/strain comparisons between Tetralogy of Fallot patients and healthy using models with different zero-load diastole and systole morphologies.

Han Yu, Dalin Tang, Tal Geva, Chun Yang, Zheyang Wu, Rahul H Rathod, Xueying Huang, Kristen L Billiar, Pedro J Del Nido

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Han YuSchool of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Dalin TangSchool of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6965-6417
Tal GevaDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Chun YangMathematical Sciences Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States of America.
Zheyang WuMathematical Sciences Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States of America.
Rahul H RathodDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7149-5421
Xueying HuangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Kristen L BilliarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States of America.
Pedro J Del NidoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute · USBoston Children's Hospital · USSoutheast University · CNXiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-specific in vivo ventricle mechanical wall stress and strain conditions are important for cardiovascular investigations and should be calculated from correct zero-load ventricle morphologies. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) data were obtained from 6 healthy volunteers and 12 Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) patients with consent obtained. 3D patient-specific CMR-based ventricle models with different zero-load diastole and systole geometries due to myocardium contraction and relaxation were constructed to qualify right ventricle (RV) diastole and systole stress and strain values at begin-filling, end-filling, begin-ejection, and end-ejection, respectively. Our new models (called 2G models) can provide end-diastole and end-systole stress/strain values which models with one zero-load geometries (called 1G models) could not provide. 2G mean end-ejection stress value from the 18 participants was 321.4% higher than that from 1G models (p = 0.0002). 2G mean strain values was 230% higher than that of 1G models (p = 0.0002). TOF group (TG) end-ejection mean stress value was 105.4% higher than that of healthy group (HG) (17.54±7.42kPa vs. 8.54±0.92kPa, p = 0.0245). Worse outcome group (WG, n = 6) post pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) begin-ejection mean stress was 57.4% higher than that of better outcome group (BG, 86.94±26.29 vs. 52.93±22.86 kPa; p = 0.041). Among 7 selected parameters, End-filling stress was the best predictor to differentiate BG patients from WG patients with prediction accuracy = 0.8208 and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value at 0.8135 (EE stress). Large scale studies are needed to further validate our findings.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularStress, MechanicalAdolescentAdultChildDiastoleFemaleHeart VentriclesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSystoleTetralogy of FallotYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31412062
PMCPMC6693773
OpenAlexW2968313756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.