ArticlePloS one2019
Biofluid modeling of the coupled eye-brain system and insights into simulated microgravity conditions.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A computational model for retinal haemodynamics under gravitational and postural variations.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- A multifactorial, evidence-based analysis of pathophysiology in Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS).Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Impact of microgravity on retinal neuroimmune responses and visual dysfunction in rats.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- The ocular mathematical virtual simulator: A validated multiscale model for hemodynamics and biomechanics in the human eye.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Modelling large scale artery haemodynamics from the heart to the eye in response to simulated microgravity.NPJ microgravity · 2024Article
- Mathematical modelling of the CSF system: effects of microstructures and posture on optic nerve subarachnoid space dynamics.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2022Article
- Computational modeling of orthostatic intolerance for travel to Mars.NPJ microgravity · 2022Article
- Article
- Ocular blood flow as a clinical observation: Value, limitations and data analysis.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2020Article
- Neurodegenerative Disorders of the Eye and of the Brain: A Perspective on Their Fluid-Dynamical Connections and the Potential of Mechanism-Driven Modeling.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
- Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS): A Systematic Review and Future Directions.Eye and brain · 2020Review
- Modeling a potential SANS countermeasure by experimental manipulation of the translaminar pressure difference in mice.NPJ microgravity · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work aims at investigating the interactions between the flow of fluids in the eyes and the brain and their potential implications in structural and functional changes in the eyes of astronauts, a condition also known as spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS). To this end, we propose a reduced (0-dimensional) mathematical model of fluid flow in the eyes and brain, which is embedded into a simplified whole-body circulation model. In particular, the model accounts for: (i) the flows of blood and aqueous humor in the eyes; (ii) the flows of blood, cerebrospinal fluid and interstitial fluid in the brain; and (iii) their interactions. The model is used to simulate variations in intraocular pressure, intracranial pressure and blood flow due to microgravity conditions, which are thought to be critical factors in SANS. Specifically, the model predicts that both intracranial and intraocular pressures increase in microgravity, even though their respective trends may be different. In such conditions, ocular blood flow is predicted to decrease in the choroid and ciliary body circulations, whereas retinal circulation is found to be less susceptible to microgravity-induced alterations, owing to a purely mechanical component in perfusion control associated with the venous segments. These findings indicate that the particular anatomical architecture of venous drainage in the retina may be one of the reasons why most of the SANS alterations are not observed in the retina but, rather, in other vascular beds, particularly the choroid. Thus, clinical assessment of ocular venous function may be considered as a determinant SANS factor, for which astronauts could be screened on earth and in-flight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.