Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31412033›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Biofluid modeling of the coupled eye-brain system and insights into simulated microgravity conditions.

Fabrizia Salerni, Rodolfo Repetto, Alon Harris, Peter Pinsky, Christophe Prud'homme, Marcela Szopos, Giovanna Guidoboni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Fabrizia SalerniDepartment of Mathematical, Physical and Computer Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Rodolfo RepettoDepartment of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Alon HarrisEugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Peter PinskyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Christophe Prud'hommeInstitute of Advanced Mathematical Research UMR 7501, University of Strasbourg CNRS, Strasbourg, France.
Marcela SzoposLaboratoire MAP5 (UMR CNRS 8145), Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.
Giovanna GuidoboniDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Mathematics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7470-0171
American Engineering & Manufacturing (United States) · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRHypertension Institute · USUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work aims at investigating the interactions between the flow of fluids in the eyes and the brain and their potential implications in structural and functional changes in the eyes of astronauts, a condition also known as spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS). To this end, we propose a reduced (0-dimensional) mathematical model of fluid flow in the eyes and brain, which is embedded into a simplified whole-body circulation model. In particular, the model accounts for: (i) the flows of blood and aqueous humor in the eyes; (ii) the flows of blood, cerebrospinal fluid and interstitial fluid in the brain; and (iii) their interactions. The model is used to simulate variations in intraocular pressure, intracranial pressure and blood flow due to microgravity conditions, which are thought to be critical factors in SANS. Specifically, the model predicts that both intracranial and intraocular pressures increase in microgravity, even though their respective trends may be different. In such conditions, ocular blood flow is predicted to decrease in the choroid and ciliary body circulations, whereas retinal circulation is found to be less susceptible to microgravity-induced alterations, owing to a purely mechanical component in perfusion control associated with the venous segments. These findings indicate that the particular anatomical architecture of venous drainage in the retina may be one of the reasons why most of the SANS alterations are not observed in the retina but, rather, in other vascular beds, particularly the choroid. Thus, clinical assessment of ocular venous function may be considered as a determinant SANS factor, for which astronauts could be screened on earth and in-flight.

Indexed as

AstronautsModels, BiologicalWeightlessnessWeightlessness SimulationBrainEyeHemodynamicsHumansIntracranial PressureIntraocular PressureSpace FlightVision, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID31412033
PMCPMC6693745
OpenAlexW2967367775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.