Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31411998›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology oncology2019

Discerning Patterns and Quality of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Use Among Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

Jinhai Huo, Mohamed D Ray-Zack, Yong Shan, Karim Chamie, Stephen A Boorjian, Preston Kerr, Bagi Jana, Stephen J Freedland, Ashish M Kamat, Hemalkumar B Mehta and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The effect of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the renal function of patients undergoing radical cystectomy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jinhai HuoDepartment of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Mohamed D Ray-ZackDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Yong ShanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Karim ChamieDepartment of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stephen A BoorjianDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Preston KerrDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Bagi JanaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Stephen J FreedlandDepartment of Urology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ashish M KamatDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Hemalkumar B MehtaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Stephen B WilliamsDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. Electronic address: stbwilli@utmb.edu.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001439 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI URBAN, RANDALL J · 2015 to 2024
$40.0M
Targeting Ral GTPases in Bladder CancerP50CA091846 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DINNEY, COLIN P.N., MCCONKEY, DAVID J. · 2001 to 2018
$37.4M
UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardTL1TR001440 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI HOMMEL, JONATHAN DEAN · 2015 to 2024
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001440NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001439NCI NIH HHS P50 CA091846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is underutilized in bladder cancer patients who undergo radical cystectomy. However, the quality of regimens used in this setting remains largely unknown.

objectiveTo determine utilization treatment patterns and survival outcomes according to regimens administered. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database to identify patients diagnosed with clinical stage TII-IV bladder cancer from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2011. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Temporal trends were assessed using the Cochran-Armitage test. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors for neoadjuvant chemotherapy use. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare overall survival according to regimens administered. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 2738 patients treated with radical cystectomy, 344 (12.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The agents most commonly used were gemcitabine (72.3%), cisplatin (55.2%), and carboplatin (31.1%). The regimens most commonly used were gemcitabine-cisplatin (45.3%), gemcitabine-carboplatin (24.1%), and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC; 6.7%). Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy more than tripled during the study period, from 5.7% in 2001 to 17.3% in 2011 (p<0.001). The quality of the regimen administered impacted survival outcomes, as M-VAC use was significantly associated with better overall survival among patients diagnosed with stage II bladder cancer (hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.86; p=0.030]. Limitations include the limited ability of retrospective analysis to control for selection bias.

conclusionsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy was underused, and the quality of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens administered for bladder cancer was inconsistent with guideline recommendations. These findings are important when interpreting population-based data on the use of chemotherapy and extrapolating survival outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: In a large population-based study, 12.6% of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, half of whom received guideline-recommended regimens. The quality of the regimen impacted survival outcomes, as use of cisplatin-based chemotherapy was significantly associated with better overall survival among patients diagnosed with stage II bladder cancer. However, <1% of radical cystectomy patients received this regimen.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCystectomyFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMedicareNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesSEER ProgramBladder cancerEpidemiology and End ResultsMedicareNeoadjuvant chemotherapyQualityRadical cystectomySurveillance

Identifiers

PMID31411998
PMCPMC8362849
OpenAlexW2886675419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.