Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31411020›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2019

Centrifugation-Assisted Immiscible Fluid Filtration for Dual-Bioanalyte Extraction.

Duane S Juang, Scott M Berry, Chao Li, Joshua M Lang, David J Beebe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott M Berry
Joshua M Lang
David J Beebe
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
An automated high-throughput tissue model for screening metastatic effectorsR01CA186134 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEEBE, DAVID J · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
[PQC-3] A Metabolic Pathway Activation Marker for Prostate Cancer PrognosisR01CA185251 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BASU, HIRAK S., BEEBE, DAVID J · 2014 to 2017
$2.9M
Understanding cell migration through microscale in vitro modelsR01EB010039 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEEBE, DAVID J, HUTTENLOCHER, ANNA · 2011 to 2014
$1.7M
VERSA: An Integrated, Multi-Endpoint Platform for Circulating Tumor Cell AnalysisR01CA181648 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BERRY, SCOTT M, LANG, JOSHUA MICHAEL · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181648NCI NIH HHS R01 CA185251NCI NIH HHS R01 CA186134NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB010039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extraction of bioanalytes is the first step in many diagnostic and analytical assays. However, most bioanalyte extraction methods require extensive dilution-based washing processes that are not only time-consuming and laborious but can also result in significant sample loss, limiting their applications in rare sample analyses. Here, we present a method that enables the efficient extraction of multiple different bioanalytes from rare samples (down to 10 cells) without washing-centrifugation-assisted immiscible fluid filtration (CIFF). CIFF utilizes centrifugal force to drive the movement of analyte-bound glass microbeads from an aqueous sample into an immiscible hydrophobic solution to perform an efficient, simple, and nondilutive extraction. The method can be performed using conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tubes with no requirement of specialized devices, columns, or instruments, making it broadly accessible and cost-effective. The CIFF process can effectively remove approximately 99.5% of the aqueous sample in one extraction with only 0.5% residual carryover, whereas a traditional "spin-down and aspirate" operation results in a higher 3.6% carryover. Another unique aspect of CIFF is its ability to perform two different solid-phase bioanalytes extractions simultaneously within a single vessel without fractionating the sample or performing serial extractions. Here we demonstrate efficient mRNA and DNA extraction from low-input samples (down to 10 cells) with slightly higher to comparable recovery compared to a traditional column-based extraction technique and the simultaneous extraction of two different proteins in the same tube using CIFF.

Indexed as

CentrifugationChemical FractionationDNAFiltrationHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionProteinsRNA, MessengerSurface PropertiesTHP-1 CellsDNAProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID31411020
PMCPMC7521759
OpenAlexW2968534848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.