Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31410957›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

Research and knowledge transfer priorities in developmental coordination disorder: Results from consultations with multiple stakeholders.

Chantal Camden, Sabah Meziane, Désirée Maltais, Noémi Cantin, Marie Brossard-Racine, Jade Berbari, Mélanie Couture

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Occupational Therapy for Children With DCD and Academic Difficulties: A Pan-Canadian Survey.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Success or Failure? Are We Meeting the Needs of Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder?Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Research and knowledge transfer priorities in developmental coordination disorder: Results from consultations with multiple stakeholders.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chantal CamdenSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Research Centre from the CR CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5503-3403
Sabah MezianeUniversity of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Désirée MaltaisUniversity Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Noémi CantinUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada.
Marie Brossard-RacineUniversité McGill, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jade BerbariSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Research Centre from the CR CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Mélanie CoutureSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Research Centre from the CR CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 360634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPriority-setting is a way to focus research and knowledge translation (KT) efforts for community-based research partnerships (CBRP).

objectiveTo identify the developmental coordination disorder (DCD) research and KT priorities of stakeholders in Quebec, Canada, and their perceptions regarding the implementation of a CBRP.

designAn advisory committee oversaw the research process including an online survey and four community forums. SETTING AND

participantsThe survey was posted online and four community forums were organized. Participants included parents of children with DCD, adults with DCD, health professionals and school staff. MAIN VARIABLES: Stakeholder generated research and KT priorities, and optimal CBPR conditions. OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants selected their top five priorities based on a predefined list of 16 research and 12 KT priorities determined in collaboration with the advisory committee. They also rated the importance of various CBRP conditions. Preliminary survey results were discussed during the forums.

resultsSurvey participants (n = 395) identified interwoven research and KT priorities where access to services was considered to be essential: supporting children at school; improving DCD identification and diagnosis; preventing secondary consequences; improving the organization of services and implementing effective services. Forum participants (n = 52) confirmed the relevance of these priorities and supported the establishment of a CBRP inclusive of all stakeholders to improve DCD services, research and KT. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsA general consensus emerged among all groups, but adults with DCD were more concerned with employment than were the other stakeholder groups. These findings are presently being used to shape an ongoing, online CBRP.

Indexed as

Stakeholder ParticipationTranslational Research, BiomedicalAdultBiomedical ResearchChildChild, PreschoolCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMotor Skills DisordersParentsQuebecResearchchildren with disabilitiesengagement in researchintegrated knowledge translationpriority-settingrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID31410957
PMCPMC6803561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.