ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021
Small Private Online Course in Teaching Oncology-Feedback After 1 Year: What Lessons?
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Pooled it
- Analysis of the effectiveness of SPOC combined with BOPPPS teaching method in stoma care training for nurses in neonatal intensive care units.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Internal medicine clerks' motivation in an online course: a mixed-methods study.Medical education online · 2025Article
- The combination of a SPOC with evaluative interactive learning in dental adhesion education: a comparison with a lecture-based learning mode.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The application and influence of "Small Private Online Course" based on flipped classroom teaching model in the course of fundamental operations in surgery in China.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effects of the small private online course combined with simulation-based training in a patient safety education program among nursing students: A quasi-experimental study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2023Article
- Design and First Impressions of a Small Private Online Course in Clinical Workplace Learning: Questionnaire and Interview Study.JMIR medical education · 2022Article
- Remote clinical training practice in the neurology internship during the COVID-19 pandemic.Medical education online · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In response to the complexity of medical care in oncology, 2 years ago, we designed a new teaching method (SPOC, Small Private Online Course) to improve cancer treatment and its management by emphasizing the community-hospital interface. The educational objective of this study was to evaluate after 1 year if the interest for this teaching remained constant over the long term to meet both educational and financial requirements. We designed a questionnaire including 18 questions grouped in 3 main parts describing the profile of the participants, his/her own experience, and the current utilization of the SPOC. Of 1574 participants of the 2 first sessions, 182 (11.5%) completed the questionnaire after 1 year. The majority of respondents were between the ages of 31 and 60 and belonged to a paramedical group (47.81%). After 1 year, 84.6% participants were satisfied or very satisfied with the content of the SPOC, 83.6% would recommended it, and 67% would be interested in using an updated SPOC again. Only 4.9% kept some contacts with other participants and 4.9% with teachers. 31.3% considered that the SPOC had a medium impact on their professional activity, 33.5% a lot, and 2.7% completely whereas 24.7% considered that it had little impact. The evaluation at 1 year showed that this digital learning method had a global positive impact on the professional practice of the participants. This study highlighted the empowerment of participants after this kind of teaching, but the network between participants was not enhanced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31410821What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.