ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2019
Validation of a portable monitoring device for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea: electrocardiogram-based cardiopulmonary coupling.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prolonged periods of shallow sleep are associated with diabetic carotid atherosclerosis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Physiological Parameters of Sleep and the Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Competitive Athletes with Poor Sleep Quality.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- SASBLS: An Advanced Model for Sleep Apnea Detection Based on Single-Channel SpO2.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Screening of preoperative obstructive sleep apnea by cardiopulmonary coupling and its risk factors in patients with plans to receive surgery under general anesthesia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Sleep disturbance exacerbates atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of a non-contact ultra-wideband bio-radar sleep monitoring device for screening of sleep breathing disease.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2022Article
- [An overview on sleep research based on functional near infrared spectroscopy].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2021Review
- Toward standardizing the clinical testing protocols of point-of-care devices for obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2021Article
- Cardiopulmonary Sleep Spectrograms Open a Novel Window Into Sleep Biology-Implications for Health and Disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to evaluate the validity of the cardiopulmonary coupling (CPC) device, a limited-channel portable monitoring device for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) screening in one single-center cohort, in particular in those with some cardiovascular diseases since the cardiopulmonary coupling might be different from those without.
methodsConsecutive patients referred to the sleep medical center for assessment of possible OSA were enrolled in this study. Patients were examined with standard polysomnography (PSG) and CPC evaluation simultaneously. The results of the two examinations were compared in all subjects and in those with or without cardiovascular abnormalities.
resultsA total of 179 subjects suspected with OSA were finally analyzed. According to OSA severity degree based on AHI, the area under ROC curve for the CPC device in the whole cohort patients was 0.79 (mild), 0.79 (moderate), and 0.86 (severe OSA), respectively (all p < 0.001). For patients with cardiovascular disease with different OSA severity, the area under the ROC curve was 0.86 (mild), 0.73 (moderate), and 0.83 (severe OSA), respectively (all p < 0.0001), and 0.74 (mild), 0.85 (moderate), and 0.91 (severe OSA), respectively in patients without cardiovascular disease (all p < 0.0001).
conclusionsThe overall performance of CPC technique was acceptable to assess OSA in subjects with clinical suspicion of OSA, and thus it might act as a fast tool to screen OSA patients. However, the sensitivity of CPC technology for patients with cardiovascular disease was relatively insufficient. Therefore, CPC technology should be carefully interpreted in OSA screening in those with cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.