ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2019
The Role of Patient-Physician Communication on the Use of Hydroxyurea in Adult Patients with Sickle Cell Disease.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07540767 (Development of a Provider-Focused Intervention to Improve Health Outcomes in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development of a Provider-Focused Intervention to Improve Health Outcomes in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sustainment of Hydroxyurea Adherence in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Provider prescription of hydroxyurea in youth and adults with sickle cell disease: A review of prescription barriers and facilitators.British journal of haematology · 2023Review
- The Evolving Pharmacotherapeutic Landscape for the Treatment of Sickle Cell Disease.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis qualitative study analyzed the perspective of patients living with sickle cell disease (SCD) on their process of deciding whether to take hydroxyurea (HU), and the role of physician communication in patients' decision-making process.
methodsFrom October 2015 to July 2016, we conducted semi-structured interviews among patients with SCD (N = 20) that were audio-recorded and transcribed. Participants were ≥ 18 years old, a patient of an urban adult sickle cell center, able to provide informed consent, and English-speaking. We iteratively developed codes and used thematic analysis to organize the key themes.
resultsMost participants were female (65%), middle aged (M = 44, SD = 12.2), and 55% were prescribed HU for an average of 10.4 (SD = 4.7) years. Participants described 3 key factors that influenced their decision regarding HU treatment: (1) lifestyle, (2) health status, and (3) HU characteristics. Four themes emerged about provider communication and HU treatment decisions: (1) provider's advisement, (2) shared decision-making, (3) "wrestled," and (4) not feeling heard.
conclusionProviders who engaged in shared decision-making empowered participants to decide whether to start HU treatment. Participants who felt their providers were not listening to their concerns expressed disengaging from HU treatment. During discussions about HU with patients living with SCD, providers must understand the multi-faceted aspects that impact patients' decision and empower patients to engage in such discussions. Further research is needed to understand the role of shared decision-making among patients with SCD to improve management of SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.