ReviewJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2020
Myocardial perfusion imaging for diabetes: Key points from the evidence and clinical questions to be answered.
Review in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic implications of quantified coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial perfusion in diabetes.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Observational
- Clinical and Translational Imaging and Sensing of Diabetic Microangiopathy: A Narrative Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- The impact of diabetes on the relationship of coronary artery disease and outcome: a study using multimodality imaging.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2023Article
- Gender differences in outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Assessing the prevalence and predicting factors of an abnormal gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Comparing left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with normal gated SPECT MPI.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Relation between myocardial blood flow and cardiac events in diabetic patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes represents a worldwide increasing problem and cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death in diabetic patients. Pathophysiology that links diabetes to cardiovascular disease is a complex and multifactorial phenomenon evolving over time and involving both large blood vessels (macrovasculature) and small blood vessels (microvasculature). Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) imaging by both single-photon emission computer tomography and positron emission tomography with different specific tracers has become an indispensable tool for discriminating normal from diseased myocardial tissues and left ventricular function and monitoring myocardial blood flows, leading to the evaluation of almost overall physiologic consequences of the macro- and microvascular impairment involved in diabetic patients. This review will provide an overview of the role of MPI in the diagnosis and risk assessment of patients with diabetes and suspected or known CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.