ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019
Potentiation of the first and second phases of the M wave after maximal voluntary contractions in the biceps brachii muscle.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study was undertaken to examine separately the potentiation of the first and second phases of the M wave in biceps brachii after conditioning maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of different durations. M waves were evoked in the biceps brachii muscle before and after isometric MVCs of 1, 3, 6, 10, 30, and 60 s. The amplitude, duration, and area of the first and second phases of monopolar M waves were measured during the 10-min period following each contraction. Our results indicated that the amplitude and area of the M-wave first phase increased after MVCs of long (≥ 30 s) duration (P < 0.05), while it decreased after MVCs of short (≤ 10 s) duration (P < 0.05). The enlargement after the long MVCs persisted for 5 min, whereas the depression after the short contractions lasted only for 15 s. The amplitude of the second phase increased immediately (1 s) after all MVCs tested (P < 0.05), regardless of their duration, and then returned rapidly (10 s) to control levels. Unexpectedly, the amplitude of the second phase decreased below control values between 15 s and 1 min after the MVCs lasting ≥ 6 s (P < 0.05). Our results reinforce the idea that the presence of fatigue is a necessary condition to induce an enlargement of the M-wave first phase and that this enlargement would be greater (and occur sooner) in muscles with a predominance of type II fibers (quadriceps and biceps brachii) compared to type-I predominant muscles (tibialis anterior). The unique findings observed for the M-wave second phase indicate that changes in this phase are highly muscle dependent. Graphical abstract Left panel-Representative examples of M waves recorded in one participant before (control) and at various times after conditioning maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of short (a1) and long (a2) duration. Left panel-Time course of recovery of the amplitude of the first (b1) and second (b2) phases of the M wave after conditioning MVCs of different durations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.