Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31410677›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2019

Can a Machine Learn from Radiologists' Visual Search Behaviour and Their Interpretation of Mammograms-a Deep-Learning Study.

Suneeta Mall, Patrick C Brennan, Claudia Mello-Thoms

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Use of Machine Learning in Eye Tracking Studies in Medical Imaging: A Review.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suneeta MallMedical Image Optimisation and Perception Research Group (MIOPeG), Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW, 2141, Australia. smal5514@uni.sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6763-7514
Patrick C BrennanMedical Image Optimisation and Perception Research Group (MIOPeG), Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW, 2141, Australia.
Claudia Mello-ThomsMedical Image Optimisation and Perception Research Group (MIOPeG), Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW, 2141, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual search behaviour and the interpretation of mammograms have been studied for errors in breast cancer detection. We aim to ascertain whether machine-learning models can learn about radiologists' attentional level and the interpretation of mammograms. We seek to determine whether these models are practical and feasible for use in training and teaching programmes. Eight radiologists of varying experience levels in reading mammograms reviewed 120 two-view digital mammography cases (59 cancers). Their search behaviour and decisions were captured using a head-mounted eye-tracking device and software allowing them to record their decisions. This information from radiologists was used to build an ensembled machine-learning model using top-down hierarchical deep convolution neural network. Separately, a model to determine type of missed cancer (search, perception or decision-making) was also built. Analysis and comparison of variants of these models using different convolution networks with and without transfer learning were also performed. Our ensembled deep-learning network architecture can be trained to learn about radiologists' attentional level and decisions. High accuracy (95%, p value ≅ 0 [better than dumb/random model]) and high agreement between true and predicted values (kappa = 0.83) in such modelling can be achieved. Transfer learning techniques improve by < 10% with the performance of this model. We also show that spatial convolution neural networks are insufficient in determining the type of missed cancers. Ensembled hierarchical deep convolution machine-learning models are plausible in modelling radiologists' attentional level and their interpretation of mammograms. However, deep convolution networks fail to characterise the type of false-negative decisions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPattern Recognition, VisualRadiologistsBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMammographyNeural Networks, ComputerRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedBreast cancerDeep learningMachine learningMammographyVisual search

Identifiers

PMID31410677
PMCPMC6737161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.