Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31410632›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2019

Electrodiffusion models of synaptic potentials in dendritic spines.

Thibault Lagache, Krishna Jayant, Rafael Yuste

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thibault LagacheDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA. thibault.lagache@pasteur.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7033-4677
Krishna JayantDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Rafael YusteDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · US

Funding

Functional consequences of GABAergic inhibition of dendritic spines at pubertyR01MH100561 · NIMH · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SHERYL S · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
Two-photon optical control of astrocytic functionR01MH101218 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI YUSTE, RAFAEL · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
CRCNS: Modeling the nanophysiology of dendritic spinesR01NS110422 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI YUSTE, RAFAEL · 2018 to 2020
$744k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100561NIMH NIH HHS R01MH100561NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101218NIMH NIH HHS R01MH101218NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110422NINDS NIH HHS R01NS110422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biophysical properties of dendritic spines play a critical role in neuronal integration but are still poorly understood, due to experimental difficulties in accessing them. Spine biophysics has been traditionally explored using theoretical models based on cable theory. However, cable theory generally assumes that concentration changes associated with ionic currents are negligible and, therefore, ignores electrodiffusion, i.e. the interaction between electric fields and ionic diffusion. This assumption, while true for large neuronal compartments, could be incorrect when applied to femto-liter size structures such as dendritic spines. To extend cable theory and explore electrodiffusion effects, we use here the Poisson (P) and Nernst-Planck (NP) equations, which relate electric field to charge and Fick's law of diffusion, to model ion concentration dynamics in spines receiving excitatory synaptic potentials (EPSPs). We use experimentally measured voltage transients from spines with nanoelectrodes to explore these dynamics with realistic parameters. We find that (i) passive diffusion and electrodiffusion jointly affect the dynamics of spine EPSPs; (ii) spine geometry plays a key role in shaping EPSPs; and, (iii) the spine-neck resistance dynamically decreases during EPSPs, leading to short-term synaptic facilitation. Our formulation, which complements and extends cable theory, can be easily adapted to model ionic biophysics in other nanoscale bio-compartments.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsAnionsCationsDendritic SpinesExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsIon Channel GatingReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateStatic ElectricitySynaptic PotentialsAnionsCationsReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAsymptotic analysisCoarse-grained modelDendritic spinesElectrodiffusionElectrophysiologySimulationsSynaptic transmission

Identifiers

PMID31410632
PMCPMC7350286
OpenAlexW2968194064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.