Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31410556›Full record

SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2019

Subarachnoid haemorrhage with negative initial neurovascular imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Midhun Mohan, Abdurrahman I Islim, Fahid T Rasul, Ola Rominiyi, Ruth-Mary deSouza, Michael T C Poon, Aimun A B Jamjoom, Angelos G Kolias, Julie Woodfield, Krunal Patel and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Diagnostic Dilemma in Delayed Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage.Lancet (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. A giant basilar artery perforator aneurysm.Radiology case reports · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Midhun MohanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Abdurrahman I IslimDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Fahid T RasulDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queen's Hospital, Romford, UK.
Ola RominiyiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Ruth-Mary deSouzaInstitute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Michael T C PoonUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Aimun A B JamjoomDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Angelos G KoliasDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Julie WoodfieldDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Krunal PatelDivision of Neurosurgery, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Aswin ChariInstitute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK. aswinchari@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0053-147X
Ramez KirollosDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), a vascular cause for the bleed is not always found on initial investigations. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the delayed investigation strategies and clinical outcomes in these cases, often described as "non-aneurysmal" SAH (naSAH).

methodsA systematic review was performed in concordance with the PRISMA checklist. Pooled proportions of primary outcome measures were estimated using a random-effects model.

resultsFifty-eight studies were included (4473 patients). The cohort was split into perimesencephalic naSAH (PnaSAH) (49.9%), non-PnaSAH (44.7%) and radiologically negative SAH identified on lumbar puncture (5.4%). The commonest initial vascular imaging modality was digital subtraction angiography. A vascular abnormality was identified during delayed investigation in 3.9% [95% CI 1.9-6.6]. There was no uniform strategy for the timing or modality of delayed investigations. The pooled proportion of a favourable modified Rankin scale outcome (0-2) at 3-6 months following diagnosis was 92.0% [95% CI 86.0-96.5]. Complications included re-bleeding (3.1% [95% CI 1.5-5.2]), hydrocephalus (16.0% [95% CI 11.2-21.4]), vasospasm (9.6% [95% CI 6.5-13.3]) and seizure (3.5% [95% CI 1.7-5.8]). Stratified by bleeding pattern, we demonstrate a higher rate of delayed diagnoses (13.6% [95% CI 7.4-21.3]), lower proportion of favourable functional outcome (87.2% [95% CI 80.1-92.9]) and higher risk of complications for non-PnaSAH patients.

conclusionThis study highlights the heterogeneity in delayed investigations and outcomes for patients with naSAH, which may be influenced by the initial pattern of bleeding. Further multi-centre prospective studies are required to clarify optimal tailored management strategies for this heterogeneous group of patients.

Indexed as

Angiography, Digital SubtractionFemaleHumansHydrocephalusMaleMiddle AgedSubarachnoid HemorrhageTomography, X-Ray ComputedMeta-analysisNon-aneurysmalSubarachnoid haemorrhageSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31410556
PMCPMC6739283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.