Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31410546›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2019

Examination of regressive features of third molars for the purpose of age assessment in the living by means of rescaled regression analyses.

M Timme, W H Timme, A Olze, C Ottow, J Gladitz, H Pfeiffer, R Dettmeyer, A Schmeling

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M TimmeInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany. m.timme@uni-muenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7717-3378
W H TimmeInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Gießen, Frankfurter Straße 58, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
A OlzeInstitute of Legal Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Turmstraße 21, 10559, Berlin, Germany.
C OttowDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
J GladitzStatistik-Service Dr. Gladitz, Zionskirchstraße 27, 10119, Berlin, Germany.
H PfeifferInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
R DettmeyerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Gießen, Frankfurter Straße 58, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
A SchmelingInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main criterion of dental age assessment in living adolescents and young adults is the evaluation of third molars' mineralization. Concerning forensic age assessment after the completion of third molars' mineralization, apposition of secondary dentine and narrowing of the periodontal membrane as seen as decreasing radiolucent areas in the radiographs for mandibular third molars have already been described as regressive features. The present study examines the combination of both these features for the purpose of age assessment in regression analyses after rescaling the data to make it on the interval scale. To this end, a total of 1245 orthopantomograms was evaluated, taken from 606 females and 639 males in the age group of 15-40 years. The apposition of secondary dentine and narrowing of the periodontal membrane as seen as decreasing radiolucent areas in the radiographs were determined for the lower third molars. The correlation of the features with the chronological age was assessed by means of rescaled regression analyses. Furthermore, regression formulas for age assessment were established. The values of the standard error of estimate ranged between 3.55 and 4.52 years. In general, the rescaled regression of the examined features appears to be suited for forensic age assessment. A limitation of the present study is the comparatively low number of evaluable teeth in the examined age group. Due to an incomplete development or a lack of the mandibular third molars, only a mere half of the respective teeth could be included in the statistical analysis.

Indexed as

Regression AnalysisAdolescentAdultAge Determination by TeethDentin, SecondaryFemaleHumansMaleMolar, ThirdPeriodontal LigamentRadiography, PanoramicRetrospective StudiesTooth CalcificationTooth RootYoung AdultAge assessmentRegressive changesRescaled regression analysesThird molars

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.