SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2019
Biomarkers in the diagnosis and symptom assessment of patients with bladder pain syndrome: a systematic review.
Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- The use of urinary biomarkers in the diagnosis of overactive bladder in female patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2021Pooled it
- Urinary Biomarkers in Interstitial Cystitis and Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Narrative Review of Differential Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Advances in Cytokines and Inflammatory Mechanisms in the Pathogenesis of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Neurophysiological, Radiological, and Molecular Biomarkers of Pain-Related Conditions: An Umbrella Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Multi-omics analysis identifies a microbiota-bile acid-TLR signaling axis driving bladder injury in interstitial cystitis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Applying K-Means Cluster Analysis to Urinary Biomarkers in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: A New Perspective on Disease Classification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Joint Terminology Report: Terminology Standardization for Female Bladder Pain Syndrome.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Broaden Horizons: The Advancement of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- A nomogram for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis based on netrin-1.International urology and nephrology · 2022Article
- Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Sonofeedback Method in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women-Preliminary Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Urinary Biomarkers in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome and Its Impact on Therapeutic Outcome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Understanding bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
- Advances in urinary biomarker discovery in urological research.Investigative and clinical urology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisBladder pain syndrome (BPS) is a disease of unknown etiology defined as an unpleasant sensation related to the bladder, associated with lower urinary tract symptoms of more than 6 weeks' duration, in the absence of any identifiable causes. Despite its impact on quality of life (QoL) and socioeconomic burden, there are no objective methods for the diagnosis or assessment of therapeutic response. We systematically reviewed biomarkers associated with BPS to update the current knowledge on this issue.
methodsA systematic review of the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, SCOPUS, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was conducted following the PRISMA statement. Original articles investigating biomarkers for the diagnosis or symptom assessment of patients with BPS were assessed; no language restrictions were applied. Animal or post-mortem studies were excluded.
resultsOf the 478 records retrieved, 11 articles were included. MIF, NGF, Etio-S, APF, and a combined methylhistamine/Il-6 model were increased in BPS urine samples versus controls. Also increased were glyceraldehyde in stool, in addition to the expression of some genes (ARID1A, ARF, CHAT, eNOS, GLI-1, iNOS, MCP-1, NGF, WNT-8A, WNT-10A), nerve density, IL-16, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1 in bladder tissue specimens. In contrast, some fecal bacteria, expression of other genes (CHT, HB-EGF, OCT-1, SMRT-1, WNT11) in the bladder urothelium, and urinary DNA methylation in CpG-sites, MCP-3, G5P1, and HB-EGF were decreased in BPS. As none of the biomarkers was studied more than once, a Forest plot could not be constructed. Only 4 articles reported the relation of biomarkers to symptom scores.
conclusionsPotential biomarkers for BPS in urine, stool, and bladder biopsy specimens are described. Further research is needed before their use in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.