Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31410495›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2019

[Role of the radiologist in surgery of colorectal liver metastases : What should be removed and what must remain].

J Strohäker, A Königsrainer, S Nadalin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. [Liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  3. [Why are too few patients with colorectal liver metastases submitted to resection?]Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J StrohäkerKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
A KönigsrainerKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
S NadalinKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. silvio.nadalin@med.uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe radical resection of colorectal liver metastases is the only curative option for affected patients. If properly performed, surgery provides the chance of long-term tumor-free survival.

objectiveSummary of the critical interaction points between radiology and surgery in the planning and performance of (complex) liver resections.

resultsThere are many interaction points between radiology and surgery in the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Radiology supports surgery by providing detailed information of the localization of metastases, information on liver inflow and outflow as well as basic information on liver quality and function. Perioperatively, it provides interventional treatment options for postoperative complications as well as ablation of non-resectable metastases.

conclusionComplex liver resections can only be performed properly and successfully after thorough planning by an interdisciplinary board of surgeons, radiologists and associated disciplines.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsHepatectomyHumansRadiologistsColorectal liver metastasisLiver anatomyLiver imagingLiver qualityLiver resection

Identifiers

PMID31410495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.