Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31410482›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2020

Age Differences in Intertemporal Choice: The Role of Task Type, Outcome Characteristics, and Covariates.

Corinna E Löckenhoff, Gregory R Samanez-Larkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Age, income, and the discounting of delayed monetary losses.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Differences in the Temporal Extension of Self-Continuity Over the Course of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Self and identity : the journal of the International Society for Self and Identity · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Effect of Delay Duration on Delay Discounting Across Adulthood.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Corinna E LöckenhoffDepartment of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Gregory R Samanez-LarkinDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG022845 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Manney Carrington Reid, ELAINE WETHINGTON · 2003 to 2026
$15.2M
Age Differences in Preferences for and Responses to Temporal SequencesR21AG043741 · NIA · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LOECKENHOFF, CORINNA E · 2013 to 2014
$406k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022845NIA NIH HHS R21 AG043741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrior research has revealed age differences in the preferred timing of monetary outcomes, but results are inconsistent across studies. The present study examined the role of task type, outcome characteristics, and a range of theoretically implicated covariates that may contribute to variations in age effects.

methodTwo types of intertemporal choice paradigms (temporal discounting and sequence construction) were administered to a diverse life-span sample (n = 287, aged 18-87). The design experimentally manipulated outcome delay (months vs years), amount (hundreds vs thousands), and valence (gain vs loss) while statistically controlling for a range of potential covariates including demographics, affect, personality, time perspective, subjective health, and numeracy.

resultsIn the temporal discounting task, no significant age differences were observed and this pattern did not differ by outcome delay, amount, or valence. In the sequence-construction task, age was associated with a preference for sequences of decreasing impact in the gain condition but not in the loss condition, whereas outcome delay and amount did not moderate age effects. Age patterns in discounting and sequences preferences remained unchanged after controlling for covariates. DISCUSSION: These findings converge with prior studies reporting weak or null effects of age in temporal discounting tasks and suggest that inconsistent results are not due to variations in outcome valence, delay, or amount across studies. Findings also add to the scarce evidence for age differences sequence-preferences. After discussing methodological limitations, we consider implications for future research and practice.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingDelay DiscountingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsYoung AdultDecision makingIntertemporal choiceTemporal discounting

Identifiers

PMID31410482
PMCPMC6909431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.