Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31410382›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2019

Large-scale directed network inference with multivariate transfer entropy and hierarchical statistical testing.

Leonardo Novelli, Patricia Wollstadt, Pedro Mediano, Michael Wibral, Joseph T Lizier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Advances in causal discovery methods for ecological time series.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. An integratediScience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hypergraph reconstruction from dynamics.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leonardo NovelliCentre for Complex Systems, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6081-3367
Patricia WollstadtHonda Research Institute Europe, Offenbach am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7105-5207
Pedro MedianoComputational Neurodynamics Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1789-5894
Michael WibralCampus Institute for Dynamics of Biological Networks, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8010-5862
Joseph T LizierCentre for Complex Systems, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9910-8972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network inference algorithms are valuable tools for the study of large-scale neuroimaging datasets. Multivariate transfer entropy is well suited for this task, being a model-free measure that captures nonlinear and lagged dependencies between time series to infer a minimal directed network model. Greedy algorithms have been proposed to efficiently deal with high-dimensional datasets while avoiding redundant inferences and capturing synergistic effects. However, multiple statistical comparisons may inflate the false positive rate and are computationally demanding, which limited the size of previous validation studies. The algorithm we present-as implemented in the IDTxl open-source software-addresses these challenges by employing hierarchical statistical tests to control the family-wise error rate and to allow for efficient parallelization. The method was validated on synthetic datasets involving random networks of increasing size (up to 100 nodes), for both linear and nonlinear dynamics. The performance increased with the length of the time series, reaching consistently high precision, recall, and specificity (>98% on average) for 10,000 time samples. Varying the statistical significance threshold showed a more favorable precision-recall trade-off for longer time series. Both the network size and the sample size are one order of magnitude larger than previously demonstrated, showing feasibility for typical EEG and magnetoencephalography experiments.

Indexed as

Directed connectivityEffective networkInformation theoryMultivariate transfer entropyNeuroimagingNonlinear dynamicsNonparametric testsStatistical inference

Identifiers

PMID31410382
PMCPMC6663300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.