Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31410362›Full record

ReviewBurns & trauma2019

Optimized clinical practice for superaged patients with hip fracture: significance of damage control and enhanced recovery program.

Zaiyang Liu, Jun Zhang, Kaiqi He, Yumei Zhang, Yuan Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Burns & trauma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative predictors for early mortality following hip fracture surgery.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zaiyang LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037 China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037 China.
Kaiqi HeDepartment of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037 China.
Yumei ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037 China.
Yuan ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037 China.ORCID 0000-0002-3122-1143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of global aging, the incidence, mortality, and medical costs of hip fracture among aged patients are increasing annually. The number of controlled clinical studies and health economics analyses that conform to evidence-based medicine principles is growing day by day. However, unfortunately, no specific recommendations regarding the procedures for the treatment of hip fracture are available. Meanwhile, the existence of both traditional treatment systems and new treatment theories means that most doctors confront difficult choices in their daily practice. These factors make the therapeutic approach for aged patients, especially among superaged patients with hip fracture, extremely challenging. This study focuses on superaged patients (> 80 years as defined by the World Health Organization) with hip fracture and includes their preoperative pathological condition; therapeutic decision-making in terms of the benefit and risk ratio, damage control theory, and enhanced recovery after surgery were also investigated. These patients were discussed specifically by combining the current treatment strategies from several experts and the results of a meta-analysis published recently. The study presents some new ideas and approaches currently recognized in the field, such as preoperative assessment, surgical planning, safety consideration, complication intervention, and enhanced recovery implementation, and further presents some clear interpretations regarding misunderstandings in clinical practice. Finally, optimized treatment according to damage control principles and enhanced recovery after surgery during the perioperative period among superaged hip fracture patients is defined.

Indexed as

Damage controlElderly orthopedic careFemoral intertrochanteric fractureFemoral neck fractureHip fractureSuperaged patient

Identifiers

PMID31410362
PMCPMC6686476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.