Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31410321›Full record

ArticleCureus2019

Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2017.

Lara Zisblatt, Fei Chen, Dawn Dillman, Amy N DiLorenzo, Mark P MacEachern, Amy Miller Juve, Emily E Peoples, Ashley E Grantham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2018.The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM
    Article
  2. Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2019.The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM
    Article
  3. Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2020.The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM
    Review
  4. Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2021.The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lara ZisblattDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Fei ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.
Dawn DillmanDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA.
Amy N DiLorenzoDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Mark P MacEachernTaubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Amy Miller JuveDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA.
Emily E PeoplesDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Ashley E GranthamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Critical appraisals provide a method for establishing the status of an area of study or evaluating the effectiveness of literature within it. The purpose of this study was to review and appraise studies published in 2017 on medical education in anesthesiology and to provide summaries of the highest-quality medical education research articles in the field. Methods Three Ovid MEDLINE databases, Embase.com, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and PsycINFO, were searched followed by a manual review of articles published in the highest impact factor journals in both the fields of anesthesiology and medical education. Abstracts were double-screened and quantitative articles subsequently scored by three randomly assigned raters. Qualitative studies were scored by two raters. Two different rubrics were used for scoring quantitative and qualitative studies, both allowed for scores ranging from 1-25. Results A total of 864 unique citations were identified through the search criteria. Of those, 62 articles met the inclusion criteria, with 59 quantitative and three qualitative. The top 10 papers with the highest scores were reported and summarized. Discussion As the first article to critically review the literature available for education in anesthesiology, we hope that this study will serve as the first manuscript in an annual series that will help individuals involved in anesthesiology education gain an understanding of the highest-quality research in the field. Once this process is repeated, trends can be tracked and serve as a resource to educators and researchers in anesthesiology for years to come.

Indexed as

anesthesiologybibliometricmedical education

Identifiers

PMID31410321
PMCPMC6684110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.