ArticlePeerJ2019
Image based quantitative comparisons indicate heightened megabenthos diversity and abundance at a site of weak hydrocarbon seepage in the southwestern Barents Sea.
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh primary productivity in the midst of high toxicity defines hydrocarbon seeps; this feature usually results in significantly higher biomass, but in lower diversity communities at seeps rather than in the surrounding non-seep benthos. Qualitative estimates indicate that this dichotomy does not necessarily hold true in high latitude regions with respect to megafauna. Instead, high latitude seeps appear to function as local hotspots of both megafaunal diversity and abundance, although quantitative studies do not exist. In this study, we tested this hypothesis quantitatively by comparing georeferenced seafloor mosaics of a seep in the southwestern Barents Sea with the adjacent non-seep seafloor.
methodsSeafloor images of the Svanefjell seep site and the adjacent non seep-influenced background seabed in the southwestern Barents Sea were used to construct georeferenced mosaics. All megafauna were enumerated and mapped on these mosaics and comparisons of the communities at the seep site and the non-seep background site were compared. Sediment push cores were taken in order to assess the sediment geochemical environment.
resultsTaxonomic richness and abundance were both considerably higher at the seep site than the non-seep location. However, taxa were fewer at the seep site compared to other seeps in the Barents Sea or the Arctic, which is likely due to the Svanefjell seep site exhibiting relatively low seepage rates (and correspondingly less chemosynthesis based primary production). Crusts of seep carbonates account for the higher diversity of the seep site compared to the background site, since most animals were either colonizing crust surfaces or using them for shelter or coverage. Our results indicate that seeps in northern latitudes can enhance local benthic diversity and this effect can take place even with weak seepage. Since crusts of seep carbonates account for most of the aggregating effect of sites experiencing moderate/weak seepage such as the study site, this means that the ability of seep sites to attract benthic species extends well beyond the life cycle of the seep itself, which has important implications for the larger marine ecosystem and its management policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.