ArticlePeerJ2019
Validity of the
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Validity and Reliability of Mobile Applications for Assessing Strength, Power, Velocity, and Change-of-Direction: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Pooled it
- Perceived exertion reflects fatigue conditions during power-aimed resistance training.International journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Validity of using perceived exertion to assess muscle fatigue during back squat exercise.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Concurrent Validity of a Stethoscope and Health App System for the Quantification of Breath Rate in Healthy Adults: Repeatability and Validity Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Validity of using perceived exertion to assess muscle fatigue during resistance exercises.PeerJ · 2022Article
- Equating Resistance-Training Volume Between Programs Focused on Muscle Hypertrophy.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Review
- The Implementation of Velocity-Based Training Paradigm for Team Sports: Framework, Technologies, Practical Recommendations and Challenges.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Video-Based System for Automatic Measurement of Barbell Velocity in Back Squat.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed (I) to assess the inter-rater agreement for measuring the mean velocity (MV) of the barbell with the
methodSixteen young healthy individuals (four women and 12 men) were tested in two sessions separated by 48 h. The 10 repetition maximum (RM) load was determined in the first testing session in the half squat exercise. The second testing session consisted of 3 sets of 10 repetitions during the half squat exercise performed against the 10RM load. Both the
resultsTrivial differences and nearly perfect correlations were observed between raters for the MV values collected under individual sets (effect size [ES] ≤ 0.02,
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.