Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31410298›Full record

ArticleTranslational neuroscience2019

Clinical Study of Neurology Nursing on Cerebral Apoplexy Rehabilitation.

Jie Chen, Shuangxi Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Role of COX6C and NDUFB3 in septic shock and stroke.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024
    Article
  7. [The Occurrence and Risk Factors of Stroke Complicated by Venous Thromboembolism].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie ChenThe first hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, China.
Shuangxi LiThe first hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, China.
Lanzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of cerebral apoplexy has been on the rise in recent years, and research on the treatment and care of this disease has also received much attention. Therefore, a clinical study of neurological care for cerebral apoplexy rehabilitation care was conducted. Firstly, the Diffie-Hellman key exchange algorithm is introduced, and then the Diffie-Hellman prediction model is established. The patient is taken as an example to carry out simulation test, and the prediction model is compared with the real data. The data of the network model training set, the verification set and the test set are obtained. Patients were divided into observation group and control group by random number table method. The evaluation indicators included the treatment efficiency and the quality of life of the two groups. The results showed that the effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The experiment proves that the clinical effect of neurological nursing on cerebral apoplexy rehabilitation nursing is positive, which can improve the limb movement and self-living ability of patients, improve the quality of life of patients and improve patient satisfaction. Clinical study of neurology nursing on cerebral apoplexy rehabilitation nursing is discussed in this paper, and the rehabilitation nursing method and formal standardized nursing process of this disease are standardized.

Indexed as

cerebral apoplexykey exchange algorithmneurologyrehabilitation nursing

Identifiers

PMID31410298
PMCPMC6689212
OpenAlexW2968384712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.