ArticleEcology and evolution2019
Contrasting seasonal and spatial distribution of native and invasive
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of environmental DNA monitoring for seaweed reproductive phenology: A case study with giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera).Journal of phycology · 2025Article
- Environmental DNA analysis as an emerging non-destructive method for plant biodiversity monitoring: a review.AoB PLANTS · 2022Review
- A concise review of the bioactivity and pharmacological properties of the genusJournal of applied phycology · 2022Review
- Reinforcement of Environmental DNA Based Methods (Biology · 2021Review
- Re-Establishment Techniques and Transplantations of Charophytes to Support Threatened Species.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Domesticated Populations ofMarine drugs · 2020Article
- Contrasting seasonal and spatial distribution of native and invasiveEcology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimLOCATION: Bay of Biscay, Northern Atlantic Coast of the Iberian Peninsula; two ports, a beach and a rocky cliff.
methodsWe designed species-specific primers in barcoding regions targeting short fragments of the rbcL gene for the invasive
resultsWe found seasonal differences in the presence of the invasive MAIN
conclusionsOur results demonstrate the utility of using eDNA for early detection and monitoring of invasive seaweed. Native and invasive
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.