ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2019
The role of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale in the emergency department: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prehospital stroke care in low- and middle-income countries: A World Stroke Organization (WSO) scientific statement.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale in an Urban Emergency Department in Ghana.Cureus · 2025Article
- A Review of emergency medical services for stroke.African health sciences · 2024Review
- Acute large-vessel occlusion masquerading as traumatic injury.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022Article
- Improving the Prehospital Identification and Acute Care of Acute Stroke Patients: A Quality Improvement Project.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
- Prehospital Notification Using a Mobile Application Can Improve Regional Stroke Care System in a Metropolitan Area.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- The validity of recognition of stroke in the emergency room (ROSIER) scale in the diagnosis of Iranian patients with acute ischemic stroke in the emergency department.Turkish journal of emergency medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStroke is one of the leading causes of morbidity, disability, and mortality in high-income countries. Early prehospital stroke recognition plays a fundamental role, because most clinical decisions should be made within the first hours after onset of symptoms. The Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) is a validated screening tool whose utilization is suggested during triage. The aim of this study is to review the role of the CPSS by assessing its sensitivity and specificity in prehospital and hospital settings.
methodsA systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature reporting the CPSS sensitivity and specificity among patients suspected of stroke were undertaken. Electronic databases were searched up to December 2018, and the quality assessment was carried out by using the Revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies -2 (QUADAS-2).
resultsEleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results showed an overall sensitivity of 82.46% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.83-88.09%) and specificity of 56.95% (95% CI 41.78-70.92). No significant differences were found in terms of sensitivity when CPSS was performed by physicians (80.11%, 95% CI 66.14-89.25%) or non-physicians (81.11%, 95% CI 69.78-88.87%). However, administration by physicians resulted in higher specificity (73.57%, 95% CI 65.78-80.12%) when compared to administration by non-physicians (50.07%, 95% CI 31.54-68.58%). Prospective studies showed higher specificity 71.61% (95% CI 61.12-80.18%) and sensitivity 86.82% (95% CI 74.72-93.63) when compared to retrospective studies which showed specificity of 33.37% (95% CI 22.79-45.94%) and sensitivity of 78.52% (95% CI 75.08-81.60).
conclusionsThe CPSS is a standardized and easy-to-use stroke screening tool whose implementation in emergency systems protocols, along with proper and consistent coordination with local, regional, and state agencies, medical authorities and local experts are suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.