Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31410071›Full record

ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2019

The role of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale in the emergency department: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

A De Luca, M Mariani, M T Riccardi, G Damiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prehospital stroke care in low- and middle-income countries: A World Stroke Organization (WSO) scientific statement.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Acute large-vessel occlusion masquerading as traumatic injury.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A De Luca *Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri, Rome, Italy.
M Mariani *Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
M T RiccardiUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
G DamianiUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStroke is one of the leading causes of morbidity, disability, and mortality in high-income countries. Early prehospital stroke recognition plays a fundamental role, because most clinical decisions should be made within the first hours after onset of symptoms. The Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) is a validated screening tool whose utilization is suggested during triage. The aim of this study is to review the role of the CPSS by assessing its sensitivity and specificity in prehospital and hospital settings.

methodsA systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature reporting the CPSS sensitivity and specificity among patients suspected of stroke were undertaken. Electronic databases were searched up to December 2018, and the quality assessment was carried out by using the Revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies -2  (QUADAS-2).

resultsEleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results showed an overall sensitivity of 82.46% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.83-88.09%) and specificity of 56.95% (95% CI 41.78-70.92). No significant differences were found in terms of sensitivity when CPSS was performed by physicians (80.11%, 95% CI 66.14-89.25%) or non-physicians (81.11%, 95% CI 69.78-88.87%). However, administration by physicians resulted in higher specificity (73.57%, 95% CI 65.78-80.12%) when compared to administration by non-physicians (50.07%, 95% CI 31.54-68.58%). Prospective studies showed higher specificity 71.61% (95% CI 61.12-80.18%) and sensitivity 86.82% (95% CI 74.72-93.63) when compared to retrospective studies which showed specificity of 33.37% (95% CI 22.79-45.94%) and sensitivity of 78.52% (95% CI 75.08-81.60).

conclusionsThe CPSS is a standardized and easy-to-use stroke screening tool whose implementation in emergency systems protocols, along with proper and consistent coordination with local, regional, and state agencies, medical authorities and local experts are suggested.

Indexed as

diagnostic accuracyemergency departmentemergency medical serviceshealthcarestroketriage

Identifiers

PMID31410071
PMCPMC6646799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.