Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31409831›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Assessing phenotype order in molecular data.

Ludwig Lausser, Lisa M Schäfer, Lyn-Rouven Schirra, Robin Szekely, Florian Schmid, Hans A Kestler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ludwig LausserInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, 89069, Ulm, Germany.
Lisa M SchäferInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, 89069, Ulm, Germany.
Lyn-Rouven SchirraInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, 89069, Ulm, Germany.
Robin SzekelyInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, 89069, Ulm, Germany.
Florian SchmidInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, 89069, Ulm, Germany.
Hans A KestlerInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, 89069, Ulm, Germany. hans.kestler@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4759-5254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological entities are key elements of biomedical research. Their definition and their relationships are important in areas such as phylogenetic reconstruction, developmental processes or tumor evolution. Hypotheses about relationships like phenotype order are often postulated based on prior knowledge or belief. Evidence on a molecular level is typically unknown and whether total orders are reflected in the molecular measurements is unclear or not assessed. In this work we propose a method that allows a fast and exhaustive screening for total orders in large datasets. We utilise ordinal classifier cascades to identify discriminable molecular representations of the phenotypes. These classifiers are constrained by an order hypothesis and are highly sensitive to incorrect assumptions. Two new error bounds, which are introduced and theoretically proven, lead to a substantial speed-up and allow the application to large collections of many phenotypes. In our experiments we show that by exhaustively evaluating all possible candidate orders, we are able to identify phenotype orders that best coincide with the high-dimensional molecular profiles.

Identifiers

PMID31409831
PMCPMC6692304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.