Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31409676›Full record

ArticlemBio2019

Molecular Mimicry of SecA and Signal Recognition Particle Binding to the Bacterial Ribosome.

Lara Knüpffer, Clara Fehrenbach, Kärt Denks, Veronika Erichsen, Narcis-Adrian Petriman, Hans-Georg Koch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Dynamic SecYEG Translocon.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Maturation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Cotranslational folding of alkaline phosphatase in the periplasm of Escherichia coli.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020
    Article
  13. Translational Control of Secretory Proteins in Health and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lara Knüpffer *Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Clara Fehrenbach *Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Kärt DenksInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Veronika ErichsenInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Narcis-Adrian PetrimanInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Hans-Georg KochInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany Hans-Georg.Koch@biochemie.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5913-0334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria execute a variety of protein transport systems for maintaining the proper composition of their different cellular compartments. The SecYEG translocon serves as primary transport channel and is engaged in transporting two different substrate types. Inner membrane proteins are cotranslationally inserted into the membrane after their targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP). In contrast, secretory proteins are posttranslationally translocated by the ATPase SecA. Recent data indicate that SecA can also bind to ribosomes close to the tunnel exit. We have mapped the interaction of SecA with translating and nontranslating ribosomes and demonstrate that the N terminus and the helical linker domain of SecA bind to an acidic patch on the surface of the ribosomal protein uL23. Intriguingly, both also insert deeply into the ribosomal tunnel to contact the intratunnel loop of uL23, which serves as a nascent chain sensor. This binding pattern is remarkably similar to that of SRP and indicates an identical interaction mode of the two targeting factors with ribosomes. In the presence of a nascent chain, SecA retracts from the tunnel but maintains contact with the surface of uL23. Our data further demonstrate that ribosome and membrane binding of SecA are mutually exclusive, as both events depend on the N terminus of SecA. Our study highlights the enormous plasticity of bacterial protein transport systems and reveals that the discrimination between SRP and SecA substrates is already initiated at the ribosome.

Indexed as

Binding, CompetitiveBinding SitesCell MembraneEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsModels, MolecularMolecular MimicryMutationProtein BindingProtein BiosynthesisProtein TransportRibosomal ProteinsRibosomesSecA ProteinsSignal Recognition ParticleEscherichia coli ProteinsRibosomal ProteinsSecA ProteinsSignal Recognition Particleprotein transportribosomesSecASecYsignal recognition particle

Identifiers

PMID31409676
PMCPMC6692507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.