Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31409613›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2019

The Indenoisoquinoline TOP1 Inhibitors Selectively Target Homologous Recombination-Deficient and Schlafen 11-Positive Cancer Cells and Synergize with Olaparib.

Laetitia Marzi, Ludmila Szabova, Melanie Gordon, Zoe Weaver Ohler, Shyam K Sharan, Michael L Beshiri, Moudjib Etemadi, Junko Murai, Kathleen Kelly, Yves Pommier

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Loss of Payload Sensitivity and Other Mechanisms of Resistance to T-DXd in HER2-Mutant NSCLC: Implications for Subsequent Responsiveness to HER2 TKIs.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laetitia MarziDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch & Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ludmila SzabovaCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research at the National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-5194-0604
Melanie GordonCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research at the National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland.
Zoe Weaver OhlerCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research at the National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland.
Shyam K SharanCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research at the National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland.
Michael L BeshiriLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Moudjib EtemadiDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch & Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Junko MuraiDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch & Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Kathleen KellyLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Yves PommierDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch & Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. pommier@nih.gov.
National Cancer Institute · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · US

Funding

PROTEIN-ASSOCIATED DNA BREAKS AS INDICATOR OF TOPOISOMERASE INHIBITIONZ01BC006150 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 1996 to 2008
$1.5M
DNA TOPOISOMERASES AS TARGET OF ACTION OF ANTICANCER DRUGSZ01BC006161 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 1996 to 2008
$1.5M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CIntramural NIH HHS Z01 BC006150Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC006161NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIrinotecan and topotecan are used to treat a variety of different cancers. However, they have limitations, including chemical instability and severe side effects. To overcome these limitations, we developed the clinical indenoisoquinolines: LMP400 (indotecan), LMP776 (indimitecan), and LMP744. The purpose of the study is to build the molecular rationale for phase II clinical trials. EXPERIMENTAL

designCellMinerCDB (http://discover.nci.nih.gov/cellminercdb) was used to mine the cancer cell lines genomic databases. The causality of Schlafen11 (SLFN11) was validated in isogenic cell lines. Because topoisomerase I (TOP1)-mediated replication DNA damage is repaired by homologous recombination (HR), we tested the "synthetic lethality" of HR-deficient (HRD) cells. Survival and cell-cycle alterations were performed after drug treatments in isogenic DT40, DLD1, and OVCAR cell lines with BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 deficiencies and in organoids cultured from prostate cancer patient-derived xenografts with BRCA2 loss. We also used an ovarian orthotopic allograft model with BRCA1 loss to validate the efficacy of LMP400 and olaparib combination.

resultsCellMinerCDB reveals that SLFN11, which kills cells undergoing replicative stress, is a dominant drug determinant to the clinical indenoisoquinolines. In addition, BRCA1-, BRCA2-, and PALB2-deficient cells were hypersensitive to the indenoisoquinolines. All 3 clinical indenoisoquinolines were also synergistic with olaparib, especially in the HRD cells. The synergy between LMP400 and olaparib was confirmed in the orthotopic allograft model harboring BRCA1 loss.

conclusionsOur results provide a rationale for molecularly designed clinical trials with the indenoisoquinolines as single agents and in combination with PARP inhibitors in HRD cancers expressing SLFN11.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzodioxolesCell Line, TumorChickensDNA DamageDNA Topoisomerases, Type IDrug SynergismFemaleHumansIsoquinolinesMiceNeoplasmsNuclear ProteinsPhthalazinesPiperazinesBenzodioxolesDNA Topoisomerases, Type IindimitecanIsoquinolinesNSC 724998Nuclear ProteinsolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsSLFN11 protein, humanTOP1 protein, humanTopoisomerase I Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31409613
PMCPMC6801079
OpenAlexW2966931594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.