Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31409419›Full record

Observational studyBreast cancer research : BCR2019

Inequities in breast cancer treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: findings from a prospective multi-country observational study.

Milena Foerster, Benjamin O Anderson, Fiona McKenzie, Moses Galukande, Angelica Anele, Charles Adisa, Annelle Zietsman, Joachim Schuz, Isabel Dos Santos Silva, Valerie McCormack

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Milena FoersterSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 Cours Albert Thomas, Lyon, France. foersterm@fellows.iarc.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-3912-1718
Benjamin O AndersonFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Fiona McKenzieSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 Cours Albert Thomas, Lyon, France.
Moses GalukandeMakerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Angelica AneleFederal Medical Centre Owerri, Owerri, Nigeria.
Charles AdisaAbia State University Teaching Hospital, Aba, Nigeria.
Annelle ZietsmanWindhoek Central Hospital, Windhoek, Namibia.
Joachim SchuzSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 Cours Albert Thomas, Lyon, France.
Isabel Dos Santos SilvaDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Valerie McCormackSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 Cours Albert Thomas, Lyon, France.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving breast cancer survival in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is urgently needed, requiring early diagnosis and improved access to treatment. However, data on the types of and barriers to receiving breast cancer therapy in this region are limited and have not been compared between different SSA countries and treatment settings.

methodsIn different health care settings across Uganda, Nigeria and Namibian sites of the prospective African Breast Cancer - Disparities in Outcomes cohort study, we assessed the percentage of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who received treatment (systemic, surgery and/or radiotherapy) for cancer and their socio-demographic and clinical determinants. Treatment data were systematically extracted from medical records, as well as self-reported by women during 6-month follow-up interviews, and were used to generate a binary indicator of treatment received within 12 months of diagnosis (yes/no), which was analysed via logistic regression.

resultsOf 1325 women, cancer treatment had not been initiated treatment within 1 year of diagnosis for 227 (17%) women and 185 (14%) of women with stage I-III disease. Untreated percentages were highest in two Nigerian regional hospitals where 38% of 314 women were not treated (32% among stage I-III). At a national referral hospital in Uganda, 18% of 430 women were not treated (15% among stage I-III). In contrast, at a cancer care centre in Windhoek, Namibia, where treatment is provided free to the patient, all non-black (100%) and almost all (98.7%) black women had initiated treatment. Percentages of untreated women were higher in women from lower socio-economic groups, women who believed in traditional medicine and, in Uganda, in HIV+ women. Self-reported treatment barriers confirmed treatment costs and treatment refusal as contributors to not receiving treatment.

conclusionsFinancial support to ensure treatment access and education of treatment benefits are needed to improve treatment access for breast cancer patients across sub-Saharan Africa, especially at regional treatment centres, for lower socio-economic groups, and for the HIV-positive woman with breast cancer.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesAfrica South of the SaharaAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsComorbidityDisease ManagementFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrognosisProspective StudiesAfricaBreast cancer treatmentCancerChemotherapyRadiotherapySurgery

Identifiers

PMID31409419
PMCPMC6691541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.