Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31409385›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2019

Comparative study of anterior segment measurements using 3 different instruments in myopic patients after ICL implantation.

Ting Wan, Houfa Yin, Yi Yang, Fang Wu, Zhiyi Wu, Yabo Yang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of measurements of anterior chamber angleWorld journal of clinical cases · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Automatic measurement and evaluation of anterior segment anatomical structures via UBM images using a deep learning-based approach.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ting WanEye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Houfa YinEye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Yi YangEye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Fang WuEye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Zhiyi WuEye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Yabo YangEye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, China. yangyabo@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2084-4422

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81500694National Natural Science Foundation of China 81870558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare and correlate anterior segment measurements of myopic eyes implanted with Implantable Collamer lens (ICL V4c) by using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), Pentacam and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM).

methodsAnterior chamber depth (ACD), distance between corneal endothelium and anterior surface of ICL(C-ICL) and central vault were measured in 82 phakic myopic eyes of 82 patients who underwent ICL surgery, by using AS-OCT, Pentacam and UBM consecutively at 3 months follow up. The correlation and agreement of instruments were accessed by using Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland-Altman plot.

resultsAS-OCT showed higher ACD, C -ICL and central vault measurements than both of Pentacam and UBM (P < 0.001), while Pentacam showed lower measurements than UBM (P < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was 0.91 to 0.96, and ICC was 0.95 to 0.98 for all measurements between difference devices (all P < 0.001). The 95% limits of agreement of ACD, C-ICL, vault measurements were 0.13 to 0.38 mm, - 0.07 to 0.27 mm, 0.08 to 0.34 mm between AS-OCT and Pentacam, - 0.03 to 0.33 mm, - 0.16 to 0.31 mm, - 0.10 to 0.26 mm between AS-OCT and UBM, and - 0.29 to 0.07 mm, - 0.25 to 0.20 mm, - 0.31 to 0.05 mm between Pentacam and UBM, respectively.

conclusionsAS-OCT demonstrated significantly higher value, while Pentacam demonstrated significantly lower value than UBM for ACD, C-ICL and central vault measurements in myopic eyes after ICL surgery. Measurements with these instruments were highly correlated, but could not replace each other especially for vault. This study provided valuable information about how to judge the results of anterior segment parameters of eyes implanted with ICL V4c from different devices.

trial registrationRegistration number: ChiCTR-OOC-16008987 . Retrospectively registered: 08 August 2016.

Indexed as

Phakic Intraocular LensesVisual AcuityAdultAnterior Eye SegmentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMicroscopy, AcousticMyopiaPostoperative PeriodRefraction, OcularReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceAnterior chamber depthImplantable Collamer lensOptical coherence tomographyPentacamUltrasound biomicroscopyVault

Identifiers

PMID31409385
PMCPMC6693247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.