Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31409355›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgical oncology2019

Curative efficacy of low frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after cervical cancer operation.

Huan Li, Can-Kun Zhou, Jing Song, Wei-Ying Zhang, Su-Mei Wang, Yi-Ling Gu, Kang Wang, Zhe Ma, Yan Hu, Ai-Min Xiao and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Huan LiShenzhen Early Diagnosis of Gynecological Major Disease Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Can-Kun ZhouDepartment of Gynecology, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China.
Jing SongShenzhen Early Diagnosis of Gynecological Major Disease Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Wei-Ying ZhangShenzhen Early Diagnosis of Gynecological Major Disease Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Su-Mei WangShenzhen Early Diagnosis of Gynecological Major Disease Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Yi-Ling GuShenzhen Early Diagnosis of Gynecological Major Disease Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Kang WangShenzhen Early Diagnosis of Gynecological Major Disease Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Zhe MaShenzhen Early Diagnosis of Gynecological Major Disease Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Yan HuShenzhen Early Diagnosis of Gynecological Major Disease Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Ai-Min XiaoShenzhen Early Diagnosis of Gynecological Major Disease Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China.
Jian-Liu WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, No.11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng Dist, Beijing, 100044, China.
Rui-Fang WuShenzhen Early Diagnosis of Gynecological Major Disease Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, Guangdong, China. ruifangwucn@126.com.
Peking University Shenzhen Hospital · CNFoshan Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the clinical significance of low-frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after radical hysterectomy.

methodsA total of 91 women with stage IA2-IB2 cervical cancer, who were treated with radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy from January 2009 to December 2012, were enrolled into this study and were randomly divided into two groups: trail group (48 cases) and control group (43 cases). Traditional bladder function training and low-frequency electrical stimulation were conducted in the trail group, while patients in the control group were only treated by traditional bladder training. The general condition, rate of urinary retention, and muscle strength grades of pelvic floor muscle in the perioperative period were compared between these two groups.

resultsThe incidence of postoperative urinary retention in the electrical stimulation group was 10.41%, significantly lower than that in the control group (44.18%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). The duration of postoperative fever and use of antibiotics were almost the same between these two groups. Eleven days after surgery, the difference in grades of the pelvic floor muscle between these two groups was not statistically significant. However, 14 days after the operation, grades of the pelvic floor muscle were significantly higher in the trail group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). In addition, although there was no significant difference between the two groups with different parameters (P = 0.782), the incidence of urinary retention was lower in the endorphins analgesia program group than in the neuromuscular repair program group (9.09% < 11.54%).

conclusionLow-frequency electrical stimulation is more effective than conventional intervention in preventing urinary retention after radical hysterectomy. It also intensifies the recovery of pelvic muscle strength.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesElectric StimulationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHysterectomyLymph Node ExcisionMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeUrinary RetentionUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultBladder trainingCervical cancerLow-frequency electrical stimulationPelvic muscle strengthUrinary retention

Identifiers

PMID31409355
PMCPMC6693168
OpenAlexW2968160070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.