Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31409275›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Estimating statistical significance of local protein profile-profile alignments.

Mindaugas Margelevičius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The COMER web server for protein analysis by homology.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mindaugas MargelevičiusInstitute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 7, Vilnius, 10257, Lithuania. mindaugas.margelevicius@bti.vu.lt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4981-6708

Funding

European Regional Development Fund 01.2.2-LMT-K-718-01-0028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlignment of sequence families described by profiles provides a sensitive means for establishing homology between proteins and is important in protein evolutionary, structural, and functional studies. In the context of a steadily growing amount of sequence data, estimating the statistical significance of alignments, including profile-profile alignments, plays a key role in alignment-based homology search algorithms. Still, it is an open question as to what and whether one type of distribution governs profile-profile alignment score, especially when profile-profile substitution scores involve such terms as secondary structure predictions.

resultsThis study presents a methodology for estimating the statistical significance of this type of alignments. The methodology rests on a new algorithm developed for generating random profiles such that their alignment scores are distributed similarly to those obtained for real unrelated profiles. We show that improvements in statistical accuracy and sensitivity and high-quality alignment rate result from statistically characterizing alignments by establishing the dependence of statistical parameters on various measures associated with both individual and pairwise profile characteristics. Implemented in the COMER software, the proposed methodology yielded an increase of up to 34.2% in the number of true positives and up to 61.8% in the number of high-quality alignments with respect to the previous version of the COMER method.

conclusionsThe more accurate estimation of statistical significance is implemented in the COMER method, which is now more sensitive and provides an increased rate of high-quality profile-profile alignments. The results of the present study also suggest directions for future research.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceProtein ConformationProteinsSequence AlignmentProteinsHomology searchProfile-profile alignmentProtein structure predictionRandom profile modelStatistical significance

Identifiers

PMID31409275
PMCPMC6693267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.