Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31409253›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Contextual priors do not modulate action prediction in children with autism.

Lucia Amoruso, Antonio Narzisi, Martina Pinzino, Alessandra Finisguerra, Lucia Billeci, Sara Calderoni, Franco Fabbro, Filippo Muratori, Anna Volzone, Cosimo Urgesi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prediction in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The effect of volatility in linguistic input on prediction behavior in autistic toddlers.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Measuring the prediction of observed actions using an occlusion paradigm: Comparing autistic and non-autistic adults.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucia AmorusoLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Languages and Literatures, Communication, Education and Society, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Antonio NarzisiIRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa (Calambrone), Italy.
Martina PinzinoIRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa (Calambrone), Italy.
Alessandra FinisguerraScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Pasian di Prato, Udine, Italy.
Lucia BilleciInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council (CNR), Pisa, Italy.
Sara CalderoniIRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa (Calambrone), Italy.
Franco FabbroLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Languages and Literatures, Communication, Education and Society, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Filippo MuratoriIRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa (Calambrone), Italy.
Anna VolzoneScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Pasian di Prato, Udine, Italy.
Cosimo UrgesiLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Languages and Literatures, Communication, Education and Society, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
University of Udine · ITFondazione Stella Maris · ITIRCCS Eugenio Medea · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian accounts of autism suggest that this disorder may be rooted in an impaired ability to estimate the probability of future events, possibly owing to reduced priors. Here, we tested this hypothesis within the action domain in children with and without autism using a behavioural paradigm comprising a familiarization and a testing phase. During familiarization, children observed videos depicting a child model performing actions in diverse contexts. Crucially, within this phase, we implicitly biased action-context associations in terms of their probability of co-occurrence. During testing, children observed the same videos but drastically shortened (i.e. reduced amount of kinematics information) and were asked to infer action unfolding. Since during the testing phase movement kinematics became ambiguous, we expected children's responses to be biased to contextual priors, thus compensating for perceptual uncertainty. While this probabilistic effect was present in controls, no such modulation was observed in autistic children, overall suggesting an impairment in using contextual priors when predicting other peoples' actions in uncertain environments.

Indexed as

MovementPsychomotor PerformanceAutistic DisorderBiomechanical PhenomenaChildFemaleHumansItalyMaleProbabilityaction predictionautismBayescontextpriors

Identifiers

PMID31409253
PMCPMC6710602
OpenAlexW2968462745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.