Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31408718›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

The effect of rule retrieval on activity in the default mode network.

Verity Smith, Daniel J Mitchell, John Duncan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ventral pallidum regulates the default mode network, controlling transitions between internally and externally guided behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Verity SmithMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Verity.Smith@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
Daniel J MitchellMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
John DuncanMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The default mode network (DMN) is often associated with internally-directed cognition, distinct from the constraints of the external environment. However, a recent finding is that the DMN shows strong activation after large task switches during a demanding externally-directed task (Crittenden et al., 2015; Smith et al., 2018). Following other proposals, we have suggested that the DMN encodes cognitive or environmental context, and that context representations are momentarily strengthened during large cognitive switches, perhaps so that new activity can be checked against current environmental constraints. An alternative account, consistent with the role of the DMN in episodic memory, might be that switches to a substantially new task increase demands on rule retrieval. To test this alternative, we directly manipulated rule retrieval demands. Contrary to the retrieval account, increased retrieval demand led to reduced DMN activity, accompanied by increased activation in prefrontal and lateral parietal cognitive control areas. Unlike episodic retrieval, with its rich contextual representations, rule retrieval does not drive DMN activity. Accordingly, it cannot explain increased DMN activity during large cognitive switches.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAdolescentAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallYoung AdultCognitive controlDMNfMRI

Identifiers

PMID31408718
PMCPMC6839614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.