Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31408633›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2020

Proteolysis and Oxidation of Therapeutic Proteins After Intradermal or Subcutaneous Administration.

Ninad Varkhede, Rupesh Bommana, Christian Schöneich, M Laird Forrest

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of NAnalytical biochemistry · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Decoding the proteome of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for cell-penetrating peptides involved in pathogenesis or applicable as drug delivery vectors.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ninad VarkhedeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047; Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics & Drug Metabolism (PPDM), Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486.
Rupesh BommanaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047; MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878.
Christian SchöneichDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047.
M Laird ForrestDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047. Electronic address: lforrest@ku.edu.
University of Kansas · USUnited States Military Academy · US

Funding

Biomaterials for treatment of head and neck cancerR01CA173292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI FORREST, MARCUS LAIRD · 2013 to 2017
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA173292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intradermal (ID) and subcutaneous (SC) routes are commonly used for therapeutic proteins (TPs) and vaccines; however, the bioavailability of TPs is typically less than small molecule drugs given via the same routes. Proteolytic enzymes in the dermal, SC, and lymphatic tissues may be responsible for the loss of TPs. In addition, the TPs may be exposed to reactive oxygen species generated in the SC tissue and the lymphatic system in response to injection-related trauma and impurities within the formulation. The reactive oxygen species can oxidize TPs to alter their efficacy and immunogenicity potential. Mechanistic understandings of the dominant proteolysis and oxidative routes are useful in the drug discovery process, formulation development, and to assess the potential for immunogenicity and altered pharmacokinetics (PK). Furthermore, in vitro tools representing the ID or SC and lymphatic system can be used to evaluate the extent of proteolysis of the TPs after the injection and before systemic entry. The in vitro clearance data may be included in physiologically based pharmacokinetic models for improved PK predictions. In this review, we have summarized various physiological factors responsible for proteolysis and oxidation of TPs after ID and SC administration.

Indexed as

ProteolysisAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalGlycoproteinsHumansInjections, IntradermalInjections, SubcutaneousLymphatic SystemOxidation-ReductionReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntibodies, MonoclonalGlycoproteinsReactive Oxygen Speciesintradermallymphatic systemoxidationPBPK modelingproteolysisreactive oxygen speciessubcutaneoustherapeutic proteins

Identifiers

PMID31408633
PMCPMC6937400
OpenAlexW2968885217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.