Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31408476›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Improving the evidence for indicator condition guided HIV testing in Europe: Results from the HIDES II Study - 2012 - 2015.

Dorthe Raben, Ann Kathleen Sullivan, Amanda Mocroft, Galyna Kutsyna, Vesna Hadžiosmanović, Anna Vassilenko, Nikoloz Chkhartisvili, Viktar Mitsura, Court Pedersen, Jane Anderson and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. High acceptability of point-of-care HIV testing at the colposcopy outpatient clinic in hospitals in the Netherlands.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  9. Missed opportunities for early HIV diagnosis in Greece: The MORFEAS study, 2019 to 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Dorthe RabenCentre for Health & Infectious Disease Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ann Kathleen SullivanChelsea and Westminster Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, United Kingdom.
Amanda MocroftUniversity College London, London, England, United Kingdom.
Galyna KutsynaLuhansk AIDS Center, Luhansk, Ukraine.
Vesna HadžiosmanovićClinical Center University of Sarajevo, Infectious Diseases Clinic, Sarajevo, Bosnia.
Anna VassilenkoBelarusian State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus.
Nikoloz ChkhartisviliAIDS & Clinical Immunology Research Center, Tiblisi, Georgia.
Viktar MitsuraGomel State Medical University, Gomel, Belarus.
Court PedersenOdense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jane AndersonHomerton University Hospital, London, England, United Kingdom.
Josip BegovacUniversity Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ulrik Bak DragstedZealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Region Zealand, Denmark.
Barbara BertischKantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Anna GrzeszczukMedical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Jane MintonSt James's University Hospital, Leeds, England, United Kingdom.
Valentina Coca NecsoiSaint-Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Maria KitchenUniversity Hospital Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Faiza AjanaCentre Hospitalier de Tourcoing, Tourcoing, France.
Anton SokhanKharkiv National Medical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0003-1860-3099
Laura ComiOspedale di Bergamo, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Paymaneh FarazmandHuddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield, England, United Kingdom.
Dragica PesutUniversity of Belgrade School of Medicine, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Stephane De WitSaint-Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
José Maria GatellHospital Clinic de Barcelona/IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Brian GazzardChelsea and Westminster Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, United Kingdom.
Antonella d'Arminio MonforteUnit of Infectious Diseases, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Jürgen Kurt RockstrohHIV Outpatient Clinic, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Yazdan YazdanpanahUniversité Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Karen ChampenoisHôpital Bichat, Paris, France.
Marie Louise JakobsenCentre for Health & Infectious Disease Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6436-8993
Jens Dilling LundgrenCentre for Health & Infectious Disease Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
HIDES Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is cost-effective to perform an HIV test in people with specific indicator conditions (IC) with an undiagnosed HIV prevalence of at least 0.1%. Our aim was to determine the HIV prevalence for 14 different conditions across 20 European countries.

methodsIndividuals aged 18-65 years presenting for care with one of 14 ICs between January 2012 and June 2014 were included and routinely offered an HIV test. Logistic regression assessed factors associated with testing HIV positive. Patients presenting with infectious mononucleosis-like syndrome (IMS) were recruited up until September 2015.

resultsOf 10,877 patients presenting with an IC and included in the analysis, 303 tested positive (2.8%; 95% CI 2.5-3.1%). People presenting with an IC in Southern and Eastern Europe were more likely to test HIV positive as were people presenting with IMS, lymphadenopathy and leukocytopenia/ thrombocytopenia. One third of people diagnosed with HIV after presenting with IMS reported a negative HIV test in the preceding 12 months. Of patients newly diagnosed with HIV where data was available, 92.6% were promptly linked to care; of these 10.4% were reported lost to follow up or dead 12 months after diagnosis.

conclusionThe study showed that 10 conditions had HIV prevalences > 0.1%. These 10 ICs should be adopted into HIV testing and IC specialty guidelines. As IMS presentation can mimic acute HIV sero-conversion and has the highest positivity rate, this IC in particular affords opportunities for earlier diagnosis and public health benefit.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisMass ScreeningAdolescentAdultAgedEurope, EasternFemaleHIVHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrevalenceSerologic TestsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31408476
PMCPMC6692030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.