Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31408456›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

What do adult outpatients included in clinical trials know about the investigational drugs being assessed: A cross-sectional study in France.

Clémentine Fronteau, Maxime Paré, Philippe Benoit, Sophie Tollec, Catherine Hamon, Vérane Schwiertz, Christian Maillard, Amélie Cransac, Christelle Volteau, Jean-François Huon and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of a decentralized investigational drug service pharmacist in a cancer clinical trial infusion unit.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Clémentine FronteauDepartment of Pharmacy, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Maxime ParéDepartment of Pharmacy, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Philippe BenoitDepartment of Pharmacy, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France.
Sophie TollecDepartment of Pharmacy, Orléans Regional Hospital, Orléans, France.
Catherine HamonDepartment of Pharmacy, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Vérane SchwiertzDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Christian MaillardDepartment of Pharmacy, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France.
Amélie CransacDepartment of Pharmacy, Dijon University Hospital and LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1836-2619
Christelle VolteauClinical Research Unit, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Jean-François HuonDepartment of Pharmacy, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Véronique BurgeotDepartment of Pharmacy, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Martine Tching-SinDepartment of Pharmacy, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Corinne GuérinDepartment of Pharmacy, AP-HP Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
Laurent FletDepartment of Pharmacy, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8305-7085
Nantes Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCentre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans · FRHôpital Cochin · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRMaison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités de Dijon · FRUniversité de Nîmes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess patient investigational medication knowledge and to identify factors associated with medication understanding by adult outpatients included in clinical trials. A cross-sectional prospectively designed survey was conducted on consecutive volunteers at 21 university teaching hospitals (in France) from February to December 2014. Investigational medication understanding was assessed at the time of the first dispensing using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire based on information obtained from the literature that provided an 8-point score. Demographic and other baseline data were collected using structured interviews. Of the 236 participants, 139 (58.9%) of the respondents were male, and the median age was 54.9 years (range: 18-83 years). The mean understanding score was 6.24 and 72.5% of the patients had a score of 6 or higher. In univariate analysis, the medication understanding score was negatively correlated with age (r = -0.15, p = 0.0247) and positively correlated with the level of education (r = 0.25, p = 0.0002). In multivariate analysis, prognostic factors of a higher medication understanding score were: graduation from high school or a higher level of education; HIV infection; phase II/III/IV studies; mention of the drug on the prescription form, and the dispensing of a single investigational medication. Only a quarter of the adult outpatients included in clinical trials had a maximum possible investigational medication understanding score. Being old and having a low level of education were found to be important risk factors for inadequate medication understanding. This and other data suggest that sponsors should encourage initiatives aimed at improving investigational medication understanding in adults enrolled in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDrugs, InvestigationalEducational StatusFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsResearch SubjectsDrugs, Investigational

Identifiers

PMID31408456
PMCPMC6692008
OpenAlexW2968935440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.