Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31408210›Full record

ArticleMuscle & nerve2019

What is Normal? Neuromuscular junction reinnervation after nerve injury.

Bianca Vannucci, Katherine B Santosa, Alexandra M Keane, Albina Jablonka-Shariff, Chuieng-Yi Lu, Ying Yan, Matthew MacEwan, Alison K Snyder-Warwick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscle & nerve, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Gene therapy ameliorates neuromuscular pathology in CLN3 disease.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hybrid Bionic Nerve Interface for Application in Bionic Limbs.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Skeletal Muscle Denervation: Sciatic and Tibial Nerve Transection Technique.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bianca VannucciDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Katherine B SantosaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Alexandra M KeaneDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Albina Jablonka-ShariffDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Chuieng-Yi LuDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Ying YanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Matthew MacEwanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Alison K Snyder-WarwickDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-9882-4213

Funding

Investigation of Terminal Schwann Cell Function in Homeostasis and InjuryK08NS096232 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER-WARWICK, ALISON K · 2017 to 2020
$717k
Molecular Mechanisms of Terminal Schwann Cell Response After Nerve InjuryF32NS098561 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SANTOSA, KATHERINE BERNADETTE · 2016 to 2017
$123k
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS098561NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS096232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn this study we present a reproducible technique to assess motor recovery after nerve injury via neuromuscular junction (NMJ) immunostaining and electrodiagnostic testing.

methodsWild-type mice underwent sciatic nerve transection with repair. Hindlimb muscles were collected for microscopy up to 30 weeks after injury. Immunostaining was used to assess axons (NF200), Schwann cells (S100), and motor endplates (α-bungarotoxin). Compound motor action potential (CMAP) amplitude was used to assess tibialis anterior (TA) function.

resultsOne week after injury, nearly all (98.0%) endplates were denervated. At 8 weeks, endplates were either partially (28.3%) or fully (71.7%) reinnervated. At 16 weeks, NMJ reinnervation reached 87.3%. CMAP amplitude was 83% of naive mice at 16 weeks and correlated with percentage of fully reinnervated NMJs. Morphological differences were noted between injured and noninjured NMJs. DISCUSSION: We present a reproducible method for evaluating NMJ reinnervation. Electrodiagnostic data summarize NMJ recovery. Characterization of wild-type reinnervation provides important data for consideration in experimental design and interpretation.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAxonsBungarotoxinsMiceMotor EndplateMuscle DenervationMuscle, SkeletalNerve RegenerationNeurofilament ProteinsNeuromuscular JunctionNeurosurgical ProceduresRecovery of FunctionS100 ProteinsSchwann CellsSciatic NerveBungarotoxinsneurofilament protein HNeurofilament ProteinsS100 Proteinsmotor endplatemotor recoverynerve injuryneuromuscular junctionreinnervation

Identifiers

PMID31408210
PMCPMC7092387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.