Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31407860›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of heart failure2019

Why has positive inotropy failed in chronic heart failure? Lessons from prior inotrope trials.

Tariq Ahmad, P Elliott Miller, Megan McCullough, Nihar R Desai, Ralph Riello, Mitchell Psotka, Michael Böhm, Larry A Allen, John R Teerlink, Giuseppe M C Rosano and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of heart failure, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Omecamtiv mecarbil, a cardiac myosin activator with potential efficacy in heart failure.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2025
    Article
  16. Adeno-associated virus-mediated gene delivery ofAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Tariq AhmadSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
P Elliott MillerSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Megan McCulloughSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Nihar R DesaiSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ralph RielloSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Mitchell PsotkaInova Heart & Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Michael BöhmKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.
Larry A AllenDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
John R TeerlinkSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Giuseppe M C RosanoCardiovascular and Cell Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Joann LindenfeldVanderbilt Heart and Vascular Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.
University of New Haven · USAlaska Heart and Vascular Institute · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USSt George's, University of London · GBUniversitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DEUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USVanderbilt Health · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current pharmacological therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction are largely either repurposed anti-hypertensives that blunt overactivation of the neurohormonal system or diuretics that decrease congestion. However, they do not address the symptoms of heart failure that result from reductions in cardiac output and reserve. Over the last few decades, numerous attempts have been made to develop and test positive cardiac inotropes that improve cardiac haemodynamics. However, definitive clinical trials have failed to show a survival benefit. As a result, no positive inotrope is currently approved for long-term use in heart failure. The focus of this state-of-the-art review is to revisit prior clinical trials and to understand the causes for their findings. Using the learnings from those experiences, we propose a framework for future trials of such agents that maximizes their potential for success. This includes enriching the trials with patients who are most likely to derive benefit, using biomarkers and imaging in trial design and execution, evaluating efficacy based on a wider range of intermediate phenotypes, and collecting detailed data on functional status and quality of life. With a rapidly growing population of patients with advanced heart failure, the epidemiologic insignificance of heart transplantation as a therapeutic intervention, and both the cost and morbidity associated with ventricular assist devices, there is an enormous potential for positive inotropic therapies to impact the outcomes that matter most to patients.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCardiotonic AgentsChronic DiseaseExercise ToleranceHeart FailureHemodynamicsHumansMortalityMyocardial ContractionQuality of LifeStroke VolumeTreatment FailureCardiotonic AgentsChronic heart failureClinical trialsInotropes

Identifiers

PMID31407860
PMCPMC6774302
OpenAlexW2968501847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.