Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31407779›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2021

Asking the Right Questions About Secondhand Smoke.

Jonathan D Klein, Margaret E Chamberlin, Elizabeth A Kress, Mark W Geraci, Susan Rosenblatt, Rachel Boykan, Brian Jenssen, Stanley M Rosenblatt, Sharon Milberger, William G Adams and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Jonathan D KleinDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Margaret E ChamberlinAmerican Institute of Biological Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Elizabeth A KressFlight Attendant Medical Research Institute, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Mark W GeraciDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Susan RosenblattFlight Attendant Medical Research Institute, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Rachel BoykanDepartment of Pediatrics, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Brian JenssenDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stanley M RosenblattFlight Attendant Medical Research Institute, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Sharon MilbergerMichigan Developmental Disabilities Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
William G AdamsDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Adam O GoldsteinDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Nancy A RigottiTobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Melbourne F HovellDivision of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, San Diego State University School of Public Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
Amanda L HolmCenter of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Richard W VandivierDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary Sciences & Critical Care, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Thomas L CroxtonDivision of Lung Diseases, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Patricia L YoungFlight Attendant Medical Research Institute, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Lani BlissardFlight Attendant Medical Research Institute, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Kate JewellFlight Attendant Medical Research Institute, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Leisa RichardsonFlight Attendant Medical Research Institute, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
John OstrowFlight Attendant Medical Research Institute, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Elissa A ResnickDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite knowledge about major health effects of secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) exposure, systematic incorporation of SHS screening and counseling in clinical settings has not occurred.

methodsA three-round modified Delphi Panel of tobacco control experts was convened to build consensus on the screening questions that should be asked and identify opportunities and barriers to SHS exposure screening and counseling. The panel considered four questions: (1) what questions should be asked about SHS exposure; (2) what are the top priorities to advance the goal of ensuring that these questions are asked; (3) what are the barriers to achieving these goals; and (4) how might these barriers be overcome. Each panel member submitted answers to the questions. Responses were summarized and successive rounds were reviewed by panel members for consolidation and prioritization.

resultsPanelists agreed that both adults and children should be screened during clinical encounters by asking if they are exposed or have ever been exposed to smoke from any tobacco products in their usual environment. The panel found that consistent clinician training, quality measurement or other accountability, and policy and electronic health records interventions were needed to successfully implement consistent screening.

conclusionsThe panel successfully generated screening questions and identified priorities to improve SHS exposure screening. Policy interventions and stakeholder engagement are needed to overcome barriers to implementing effective SHS screening. IMPLICATIONS: In a modified Delphi panel, tobacco control and clinical prevention experts agreed that all adults and children should be screened during clinical encounters by asking if they are exposed or have ever been exposed to smoke from tobacco products. Consistent training, accountability, and policy and electronic health records interventions are needed to implement consistent screening. Increasing SHS screening will have a significant impact on public health and costs.

Indexed as

AdultChildCounselingEnvironmental ExposureHumansSmoke-Free PolicyTobacco Smoke PollutionTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID31407779
PMCPMC7974019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.