Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31407480›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2019

Bacterial inhibition efficiency of prilocaine and bupivacaine.

Sevgi Kesici, Mehmet Demirci, Ugur Kesici

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Local anesthetics as a tool for Staphylococcus spp. control: a systematic review.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Effect of pre-incisional and peritoneal local anesthetics administration on colon anastomosis and wound healing.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Antimicrobial effects of fentanyl and bupivacaine].Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sevgi KesiciDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8276-6039
Mehmet DemirciFaculty of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, University of Beykent, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9670-2426
Ugur KesiciFaculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, University of Beykent, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7457-6625
Beykent University · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to demonstrate the antibacterial effects of bupivacaine and prilocaine on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In our study, the in vitro antimicrobial effects of 20 mg/mL prilocaine and 5 mg/mL bupivacaine were tested against a S. aureus American-type culture collection (ATCC) 29213, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and E. coli ATCC 25922, divided into Group P (Prilocaine) and Group B (Bupivacaine), respectively. S. aureus ATCC 29213, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and E. coli ATCC 25922 were cultured on Mueller Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) plates for 18 to 24 hours at 37°C. In terms of inhibition zone diameters, inhibition of S. aureus ATCC 29213 was observed in both groups at the 12th and 24th hours. The 12th- and 24th-hour S. aureus ATCC 29213 value was significantly higher in Group P compared with Group B (P = .008). At the 12th and 24th hours, inhibition of E. coli ATCC 25922 was observed in both groups. The 12th- and 24th-hour E. coli ATCC 25922 value was significantly higher in Group P compared with Group B (P = .008). In our study, it was seen that prilocaine and bupivacaine had an antimicrobial effect on S. aureus and E. coli. In the comparison between these two local anesthetics (LAs), this effect was found to be significantly higher in prilocaine than bupivacaine. Therefore, we are of the opinion that antimicrobial effect potentials should also be taken into account in the selection of an LA agent in order to prevent the complications of an infection that might develop during LA infiltration and might lead to serious morbidity.

Indexed as

BupivacaineEscherichia coliHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrilocainePseudomonas aeruginosaSensitivity and SpecificityStaphylococcus aureusStatistics, NonparametricBupivacainePrilocaineantibacterialbupivacaineprilocaineStaphylococcus aureuswound healing

Identifiers

PMID31407480
PMCPMC7948626
OpenAlexW2967469519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.