Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31407479›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2019

Antibacterial effects of lidocaine and adrenaline.

Sevgi Kesici, Mehmet Demirci, Ugur Kesici

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Local anesthetics as a tool for Staphylococcus spp. control: a systematic review.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Ex Vivo Analysis of the Effect of Endoscopic Premedications on the Microbiota Profile in Gastric Juice.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect of pre-incisional and peritoneal local anesthetics administration on colon anastomosis and wound healing.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Antibacterial effects of lidocaine and adrenaline.International wound journal · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sevgi KesiciDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences, Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8276-6039
Mehmet DemirciDepartment of Microbiology, University of Beykent, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9670-2426
Ugur KesiciUniversity of Beykent, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7457-6625
Beykent University · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most commonly used local anaesthetics (LAs) for postoperative analgesia and surgical anaesthesia are lidocaine and bupivacaine. Adrenaline is a vasopressor agent, which is widely used in anaesthesia for many purposes. This study aims to determine the antibacterial efficacy of lidocaine, mupirocin, adrenaline, and lidocaine + adrenaline combination. In our study, the in vitro antimicrobial effect of 1 mL of sterile saline, 20 mg/mL mupirocin, 20 mg/mL lidocaine, 1 mg/mL adrenaline, and 20 mg/mL lidocaine and adrenaline were tested against Staphylococcus aureus American-type culture collection (ATCC) 29213, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, classified as Group C (control), Group M (mupirocin), Group L (lidocaine), Group A (adrenaline), and Group LA (lidocaine+adrenaline), respectively. S. aureus ATCC 29213, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and E. coli ATCC 25922 were cultured on Mueller-Hinton agar (Oxoid, UK) plates for 18 to 24 hours at 37°C. Colonies from these plates were suspended in sterile saline, and a 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard suspension (corresponding to 1.5 × 10

Indexed as

EpinephrineEscherichia coliHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLidocaineMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaSensitivity and SpecificityStaphylococcus aureusEpinephrineLidocaineadrenalineantibacterialEscherichia colilidocainePseudomonas aeruginosasepsisStaphylococcus aureuswound healing

Identifiers

PMID31407479
PMCPMC7949267
OpenAlexW2968195275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.