Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31407463›Full record

GuidelineNeurogastroenterology and motility2020

The international anorectal physiology working group (IAPWG) recommendations: Standardized testing protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function.

Emma V Carrington, Henriette Heinrich, Charles H Knowles, Mark Fox, Satish Rao, Donato F Altomare, Adil E Bharucha, Rebecca Burgell, William D Chey, Guiseppe Chiarioni and 20 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04949646 (Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of Pelvic Autonomous Nerve Plexus During Total Mesorectal Excision), which is not on this map. Cited by 140 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
21.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04949646 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of Pelvic Autonomous Nerve Plexus During Total Mesorectal Excision

TypeinterventionalSponsorLarissa University HospitalRan2021 to 2028Enrolled44ConditionsRectal NeoplasmsArmsPelvic Intraoperative Neuromonitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 299 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. [Seoul Consensus on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Constipation].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Development of a Simple, Point-of-Care Device to Test Anorectal Function in Patients with Constipation: Randomized Clinical Trial.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Novel Fecobionics Defecatory Function Testing.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2019
    Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Short and long-term outcomes of anorectal biofeedback therapy in patients with functional defecation disorders: Efficacy and predictors of response.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.

Emma V CarringtonQueen Mary, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9467-9223
Henriette HeinrichUniversity of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6355-0921
Charles H KnowlesQueen Mary, University of London, London, UK.
Mark FoxUniversity of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4394-5584
Satish RaoMedical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4446-8452
Donato F AltomareUniversity Aldo Moro of Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8980-2752
Adil E BharuchaMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7644-0390
Rebecca BurgellMonash University and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
William D CheyMichigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Guiseppe ChiarioniAOUI Verona, Verona, Italy.
Philip DinningFlinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Anton EmmanuelUniversity College London, London, UK.
Ridzuan FaroukNational University Hospital Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore.
Richelle J F Felt-BersmaUMC Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kee Wook JungAsan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3771-3691
Anthony LemboHarvard Medical School, St, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4479-1188
Allison MalcolmUniversity of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ravinder K MittalUniversity of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0181-9697
Franҫois MionUniversité de Lyon et Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Seung-Jae MyungAsan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
P Ronan O'ConnellUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Christian PehlKrankenhaus Vilsbiburg and Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jose María Remes-TrocheUniversity of Veracruz, Veracruz, Mexico.
R Matthew ReveilleUniversity of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Carolynne J VaizeySt Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Veronique VittonAP-HM - Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1314-7111
William E WhiteheadUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6587-7602
Reuben K WongNational University Hospital Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore.
S Mark ScottQueen Mary, University of London, London, UK.
All members of the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group
Queen Mary University of London · GBAsan Medical Center · KRNational University Hospital · SGUniversity of Zurich · CHAix-Marseille Université · FRAlfred Health · AUAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLAugusta University · USFlinders University · AUHarvard University · USMayo Clinic · USMichigan Medicine · USSt Mark's Hospital · GBTechnical University of Munich · DEThe University of Sydney · AUUniversidad Veracruzana · MXUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

Fecal Incontinence Treatment Study (FIT Study)U01DK115575 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BHARUCHA, ADIL E. · 2018 to 2023
$10.0M
Pathophysiology of Anorectal DisordersR01DK078924 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BHARUCHA, ADIL E. · 2008 to 2023
$5.0M
Comparative Effectiveness of Biofeedback, Sacral Nerve Stimulation, and Injectable Bulking Agents for Treatment of Fecal IncontinenceU34DK109191 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BHARUCHA, ADIL E., GANTZ, MARIE G · 2016 to 2017
$711k
NEUROMODULATION THERAPY FOR FECAL INCONTINENCER21DK104127 · NIDDK · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, SATISH SC · 2015 to 2016
$395k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK078924NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK104127NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK115575NIDDK NIH HHS U34 DK109191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis manuscript summarizes consensus reached by the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) for the performance, terminology used, and interpretation of anorectal function testing including anorectal manometry (focused on high-resolution manometry), the rectal sensory test, and the balloon expulsion test. Based on these measurements, a classification system for disorders of anorectal function is proposed.

methodsTwenty-nine working group members (clinicians/academics in the field of gastroenterology, coloproctology, and gastrointestinal physiology) were invited to six face-to-face and three remote meetings to derive consensus between 2014 and 2018. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS: The IAPWG protocol for the performance of anorectal function testing recommends a standardized sequence of maneuvers to test rectoanal reflexes, anal tone and contractility, rectoanal coordination, and rectal sensation. Major findings not seen in healthy controls defined by the classification are as follows: rectoanal areflexia, anal hypotension and hypocontractility, rectal hyposensitivity, and hypersensitivity. Minor and inconclusive findings that can be present in health and require additional information prior to diagnosis include anal hypertension and dyssynergia. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: This framework introduces the IAPWG protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function based on objective physiological measurement. The use of a common language to describe results of diagnostic tests, standard operating procedures, and a consensus classification system is designed to bring much-needed standardization to these techniques.

Indexed as

Anal CanalGastroenterologyHumansIntestinal DiseasesManometryanorectal function testinganorectal manometryballoon expulsion testfunctional anorectal disordersrectal sensory test

Identifiers

PMID31407463
PMCPMC6923590
OpenAlexW2969137582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.